Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use u32 methods instead of manual shifting #105893

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2022

Conversation

Ayush1325
Copy link
Contributor

Switch to to_le_bytes() and from_le_bytes() instead of manual shifting

This was suggested here

Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh ayushsingh1325@gmail.com

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 19, 2022

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 19, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 19, 2022

📌 Commit 6913efa626c3d8420a402588a80cf1f074a3cdfb has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 19, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 19, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 6913efa626c3d8420a402588a80cf1f074a3cdfb with merge cbefec03be94fa09e4009d3b78cbb950c98daaf1...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 19, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 19, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 23, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 23, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 6913efa626c3d8420a402588a80cf1f074a3cdfb with merge f749ff04a32e3fa1eec6296354546e391fab13ba...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 23, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 23, 2022
@Ayush1325 Ayush1325 force-pushed the remote-test-server-improve branch from 6913efa to 102a07e Compare December 23, 2022 10:38
Switch to `to_be_bytes()` and `from_be_bytes()` instead of manual
shifting

This was suggested [`here`](rust-lang#105145 (comment))

Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
@Ayush1325 Ayush1325 force-pushed the remote-test-server-improve branch from 102a07e to 51fe248 Compare December 23, 2022 10:38
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 24, 2022

📌 Commit 51fe248 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 24, 2022
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Dec 24, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 24, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 51fe248 with merge 4f4d058...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 24, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 4f4d058 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 24, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 4f4d058 into rust-lang:master Dec 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 24, 2022
@Ayush1325 Ayush1325 deleted the remote-test-server-improve branch December 24, 2022 08:35
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4f4d058): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
…, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Use u32 methods instead of manual shifting

Switch to `to_le_bytes()` and `from_le_bytes()` instead of manual shifting

This was suggested [`here`](rust-lang#105145 (comment))

Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants