Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

I moved the comment at the top of the file and clarified it a little bit.

r? @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 20, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 20, 2022

📌 Commit babd174 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 20, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#105835 (Refactor post borrowck cleanup passes)
 - rust-lang#105930 (Disable `NormalizeArrayLen`)
 - rust-lang#105938 (Update coerce_unsized tracking issue from rust-lang#27732 to rust-lang#18598)
 - rust-lang#105939 (Improve description of struct-fields GUI test)
 - rust-lang#105943 (Add regression test for rust-lang#102206)
 - rust-lang#105944 (Add regression test for rust-lang#80816)
 - rust-lang#105945 (Add regression test for rust-lang#57404)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 191a877 into rust-lang:master Dec 20, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 20, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the improve-description-gui-test branch December 20, 2022 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants