Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix invalid files array re-creation in rustdoc-gui tester #106689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2023

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Jan 10, 2023

It fixes the error expected runTest first argument to be a string:

{
  file_name: {
    file_name: '/home/imperio/rust/rust/src/test/rustdoc-gui/type-declation-overflow.goml',
    output: 'type-declation-overflow... FAILED\n' +
      '...'
  },
  output: Error: expected `runTest` first argument to be a string
      at runTest (/home/imperio/rust/rust/node_modules/browser-ui-test/src/index.js:591:15)
      at runTests (/home/imperio/rust/rust/src/tools/rustdoc-gui/tester.js:144:26)
      at main (/home/imperio/rust/rust/src/tools/rustdoc-gui/tester.js:278:15)
} Error: expected `runTest` first argument to be a string
    at runTest (/home/imperio/rust/rust/node_modules/browser-ui-test/src/index.js:591:15)
    at runTests (/home/imperio/rust/rust/src/tools/rustdoc-gui/tester.js:144:26)
    at main (/home/imperio/rust/rust/src/tools/rustdoc-gui/tester.js:278:15)

The problem was that I concatenated two arrays of object whereas files is supposed to be an array of string.

r? @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 10, 2023
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 10, 2023

📌 Commit 2214c6d has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 10, 2023

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 999. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 10, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2023
Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#105194 (Add comment to cleanup_kinds)
 - rust-lang#106521 (remove E0280)
 - rust-lang#106628 (Remove unneeded ItemId::Primitive variant)
 - rust-lang#106635 (std sync tests: better type name, clarifying comment)
 - rust-lang#106642 (Add test for rust-lang#106062)
 - rust-lang#106645 ([RFC 2397] Initial implementation)
 - rust-lang#106653 (Fix help docs for -Zallow-features)
 - rust-lang#106657 (Remove myself from rust-lang/rust reviewers)
 - rust-lang#106662 (specialize impl of `ToString` on `bool`)
 - rust-lang#106669 (create helper function for `rustc_lint_defs::Level` and remove it's duplicated code)
 - rust-lang#106671 (Change flags with a fixed default value from Option<bool> to bool)
 - rust-lang#106689 (Fix invalid files array re-creation in rustdoc-gui tester)
 - rust-lang#106690 (Fix scrolling for item declaration block)
 - rust-lang#106698 (Add compiler-errors to some trait system notification groups)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2c946bc into rust-lang:master Jan 11, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 11, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rustdoc-gui-files-array branch January 11, 2023 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants