Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace unwrap with ? in TcpListener doc #107535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2023

Conversation

dcompoze
Copy link
Contributor

The example in TcpListener doc returns std::io::Result<()> but the code inside the function uses unwrap() instead of ?.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 31, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cuviper (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 31, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 31, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 31, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 31, 2023

📌 Commit 943f833 has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 31, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106898 (Include both md and yaml ICE ticket templates)
 - rust-lang#107331 (Clean up eslint annotations and remove unused JS function)
 - rust-lang#107348 (small refactor to new projection code)
 - rust-lang#107354 (rustdoc: update Source Serif 4 from 4.004 to 4.005)
 - rust-lang#107412 (avoid needless checks)
 - rust-lang#107467 (Improve enum checks)
 - rust-lang#107486 (Track bound types like bound regions)
 - rust-lang#107491 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS from `.setting-check`)
 - rust-lang#107508 (`Edition` micro refactor)
 - rust-lang#107525 (PointeeInfo is advisory only)
 - rust-lang#107527 (rustdoc: stop making unstable items transparent)
 - rust-lang#107535 (Replace unwrap with ? in TcpListener doc)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit adc3f8a into rust-lang:master Feb 1, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 1, 2023
@dcompoze dcompoze deleted the tcp-doc-unwrap branch February 5, 2023 01:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants