Run the tools builder on all PRs #107700
Merged
Run the tools builder on all PRs #107700
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Previously, it would only run on changes to subtrees, submodules, or select directories. That made it so that changes to the compiler that broke tools would only be detected on a full bors merge. This makes it so the tools builder runs by default, making it easier to catch breaking changes to clippy (which was the most effected).
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2023
…acrum Run the tools builder on all PRs Previously, it would only run on changes to subtrees, submodules, or select directories. That made it so that changes to the compiler that broke tools would only be detected on a full bors merge. This makes it so the tools builder runs by default, making it easier to catch breaking changes to clippy (which was the most affected). r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` cc `@pietroalbini` `@flip1995` `@m-ou-se`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#100599 (Add compiler error E0523 long description and test) - rust-lang#107471 (rustdoc: do not include empty default-settings tag in HTML) - rust-lang#107555 (Modify existing bounds if they exist) - rust-lang#107662 (Turn projections into copies in CopyProp.) - rust-lang#107695 (Add test for Future inflating arg size to 3x ) - rust-lang#107700 (Run the tools builder on all PRs) - rust-lang#107706 (Mark 'atomic_mut_ptr' methods const) - rust-lang#107709 (Fix problem noticed in PR106859 with char -> u8 suggestion) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
Cc @rust-lang/miri -- turns out Miri is now checked on all PRs, not just the ones that change Miri (or |
|
The current behavior is what I would expect. Is it a problem? |
No, it's great. :) I just wondered why I got a CI failure in a PR where I didn't even expect Miri to run. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, it would only run on changes to subtrees, submodules, or select directories. That made it so that changes to the compiler that broke tools would only be detected on a full bors merge. This makes it so the tools builder runs by default, making it easier to catch breaking changes to clippy (which was the most affected).
r? @Mark-Simulacrum cc @pietroalbini @flip1995 @m-ou-se