-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Fix json reexports of different items with same name #107766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
bors
merged 4 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
GuillaumeGomez:fix-json-reexports-of-different-items-with-same-name
Feb 19, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0541a0c
Allow reexports of items with same name but different types to both a…
GuillaumeGomez 7d47d7c
Add regression test for #107677
GuillaumeGomez 3adc081
Fix bad handling of primitive types
GuillaumeGomez 1ae875f
Improve code readability
GuillaumeGomez File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
// Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107677>. | ||
|
||
#![feature(no_core)] | ||
#![no_core] | ||
|
||
pub mod nested { | ||
// @set foo_struct = "$.index[*][?(@.docs == 'Foo the struct')].id" | ||
|
||
/// Foo the struct | ||
pub struct Foo {} | ||
|
||
// @set foo_fn = "$.index[*][?(@.docs == 'Foo the function')].id" | ||
|
||
#[allow(non_snake_case)] | ||
/// Foo the function | ||
pub fn Foo() {} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// @ismany "$.index[*][?(@.inner.name == 'Foo' && @.kind == 'import')].inner.id" $foo_fn $foo_struct | ||
// @ismany "$.index[*][?(@.inner.name == 'Bar' && @.kind == 'import')].inner.id" $foo_fn $foo_struct | ||
|
||
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.inner.name == 'Foo' && @.kind == 'import')]" 2 | ||
pub use nested::Foo; | ||
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.inner.name == 'Bar' && @.kind == 'import')]" 2 | ||
pub use Foo as Bar; |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this test be expanded a bit more? I'd like to see it checking that their are items for both
Foo
s, and that each name imports both of the foo items (instead of just checking that their are two imports with each name).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Eg: