Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a bug in exporting trait implementations #10788

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

I used the wrong condition where I was looking for "is this method public or is
this implementation a trait" rather than what was being checked.

I used the wrong condition where I was looking for "is this method public or is
this implementation a trait" rather than what was being checked.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2013
I used the wrong condition where I was looking for "is this method public or is
this implementation a trait" rather than what was being checked.
@bors bors closed this Dec 4, 2013
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the fixes branch December 5, 2013 05:23
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2023
add lint [`incorrect_clone_impl_on_copy_type`]

Split off from rust-lang#10788.

Closes rust-lang#10700

----

changelog: new lint [`incorrect_clone_impl_on_copy_type`]
[rust-lang#10925](rust-lang/rust-clippy#10925)
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2023
…impl, r=xFrednet,blyxyas

New lint [`manual_partial_ord_and_ord_impl`]

Lints when both `PartialOrd` and `Ord` are manually implemented yet the body of `PartialOrd::partial_cmp` isn't `Some(self.cmp(<other>))`.

This is in `correctness` currently but I'm ok with elsewhere.

Closes rust-lang#10744

---

changelog: new lint [`needless_partial_ord_impl`]
[rust-lang#10788](rust-lang/rust-clippy#10788)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants