Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: drop unused deps #108432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2023
Merged

test: drop unused deps #108432

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2023

Conversation

klensy
Copy link
Contributor

@klensy klensy commented Feb 24, 2023

Looks unused. Anyway, tests should catch any breakage.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 24, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 24, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 24, 2023

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Random changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.
This was probably unintentional and should be reverted before this PR is merged.

If this was intentional then you can ignore this comment.

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 25, 2023

📌 Commit c3749dd has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 25, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#107062 (Do some cleanup of doc/index.md)
 - rust-lang#107890 (Lint against `Iterator::map` receiving a callable that returns `()`)
 - rust-lang#108431 (Add regression test for rust-lang#107918)
 - rust-lang#108432 (test: drop unused deps)
 - rust-lang#108436 (make "proc macro panicked" translatable)
 - rust-lang#108444 (docs/test: add UI test and docs for `E0476`)
 - rust-lang#108449 (Do not lint ineffective unstable trait impl for unresolved trait)
 - rust-lang#108456 (Complete migrating `ast_passes` to derive diagnostics)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4ab1c74 into rust-lang:master Feb 26, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants