Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline simplify_type #109126

Closed

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Other attempt to speed up #109097 (comment)

r? @ghost

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 14, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 14, 2023

⌛ Trying commit b712171a4de4d956ed570972d797443ac7b9e1ec with merge 9aebdc4c5ac7d4ac7e1ac0ceef8880245fab5636...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 14, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 9aebdc4c5ac7d4ac7e1ac0ceef8880245fab5636 (9aebdc4c5ac7d4ac7e1ac0ceef8880245fab5636)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (9aebdc4c5ac7d4ac7e1ac0ceef8880245fab5636): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.6%, -0.2%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.7% [-0.8%, -0.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.6%, -0.2%] 3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.3%, 2.6%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.7% [-3.8%, -3.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
7.5% [2.1%, 11.6%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 14, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Not enough of an improvement 🤔

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 15, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 15, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 41b0bc1 with merge 696e1882231442246df5b34246a004cea7b62daf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 15, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 696e1882231442246df5b34246a004cea7b62daf (696e1882231442246df5b34246a004cea7b62daf)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (696e1882231442246df5b34246a004cea7b62daf): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.1% [1.1%, 1.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [2.5%, 2.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.3% [-5.0%, -3.5%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 15, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the simplify-type-inline branch August 11, 2023 20:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants