Skip to content

rustdoc: clean up JS #110030

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2023
Merged

rustdoc: clean up JS #110030

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2023

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

  • Stop checking func in onEach. It's always hard-coded right at the call site, so there's no point.
  • Use the ternary operator in a few spots where it makes sense.
  • No point in making onEach store arr.length in a variable if it's only used once anyway.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 6, 2023

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 6, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 6, 2023

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

* Stop checking `func` in `onEach`. It's always hard-coded right
  at the call site, so there's no point.
* Use the ternary operator in a few spots where it makes sense.
* No point in making `onEach` store `arr.length` in a variable if
  it's only used once anyway.
@notriddle notriddle force-pushed the notriddle/clean-up-js branch from c8121f9 to 815f5bb Compare April 6, 2023 23:25
@notriddle notriddle changed the title rustdoc: clean up storage.js and main.js rustdoc: clean up JS Apr 6, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 7, 2023

📌 Commit 815f5bb has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 7, 2023
notriddle added a commit to notriddle/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2023
…=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: clean up JS

* Stop checking `func` in `onEach`. It's always hard-coded right at the call site, so there's no point.
* Use the ternary operator in a few spots where it makes sense.
* No point in making `onEach` store `arr.length` in a variable if it's only used once anyway.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2023
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#110030 (rustdoc: clean up JS)
 - rust-lang#110037 (rustdoc: add test and bug fix for theme defaults)
 - rust-lang#110065 (Fix wrong type in docs: i16 -> u16)
 - rust-lang#110068 (Temporarily remove myself from reviewers list)
 - rust-lang#110075 (Fix a typo in `config.example.toml`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 77639c0 into rust-lang:master Apr 8, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 8, 2023
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/clean-up-js branch April 8, 2023 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants