Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update documentation wording on path 'try_exists' functions #110266

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2023

Conversation

tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

Just eliminate the quadruple negation in doesn't silently ignore errors unrelated to ... not existing.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 13, 2023

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 13, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 13, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

library/std/src/fs.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
library/std/src/path.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
library/std/src/path.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Apr 26, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 26, 2023

📌 Commit 9c567fd has been approved by jyn514

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 26, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2023
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108416 (black_box doc corrections for clarification - Issue rust-lang#107957)
 - rust-lang#109379 (Replace `yes` command by `while-echo` in test `tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs`)
 - rust-lang#110266 (Update documentation wording on path 'try_exists' functions)
 - rust-lang#110329 (Improve tests for rust-lang#110138)
 - rust-lang#110418 (Spelling rustdoc)
 - rust-lang#110587 (Fix `std` compilation error for wasi+atomics)
 - rust-lang#110594 (`rustc --help` add `--cfg` SPEC declaration.)
 - rust-lang#110792 (Use the standard macOS CI runner)
 - rust-lang#110817 (Add regression tests for const-generic inherent associated types)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ce30232 into rust-lang:master Apr 26, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 26, 2023
@tgross35 tgross35 deleted the try-exists-wording branch April 26, 2023 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants