Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always require closure parameters to be Sized #111864

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2023

Conversation

Jules-Bertholet
Copy link
Contributor

@Jules-Bertholet Jules-Bertholet commented May 23, 2023

The rust-call ABI isn't compatible with #![feature(unsized_fn_params)], so trying to use that feature with closures leads to an ICE (#67981). This turns that ICE into a type-check error.

@rustbot label A-closures F-unsized_fn_params

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 23, 2023

r? @spastorino

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 23, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added F-unsized_fn_params `#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]` A-closures Area: Closures (`|…| { … }`) labels May 23, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Can you test more combinations, like Fn<([u8],)> obligations with the (desugared) fn trait?

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

compiler-errors commented May 23, 2023

Squash this into one commit, please, then I can approve.

The `rust-call` ABI isn't compatible with
`#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]`, so trying to use that feature with
closures leads to an ICE (rust-lang#67981). This turns that ICE into a
type-check error.
@Jules-Bertholet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Lol, sorry, mistakenly mixed up two examples and thought it still ICEd.

Anywho, if I do find some way of triggering another ICE like this with just fn pointers I'll just open another issue.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 23, 2023

📌 Commit 5cd02ea has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 23, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 24, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111861 (Don't ICE on return-type notation when promoting trait preds to associated type bounds)
 - rust-lang#111864 (Always require closure parameters to be `Sized`)
 - rust-lang#111870 (Rename `traits_in_crate` query to `traits`)
 - rust-lang#111880 (Don't ICE when computing PointerLike trait when region vars are in param-env)
 - rust-lang#111887 (Add regression tests for pretty-printing inherent projections)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit efea88a into rust-lang:master May 24, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 24, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2023
…d, r=eholk

Don't ICE on unsized `extern "rust-call"` call

Conceptually builds on rust-lang#111864, but doesn't depend on it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-closures Area: Closures (`|…| { … }`) F-unsized_fn_params `#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants