-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't check for misaligned raw pointer derefs inside Rvalue::AddressOf #112026
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
// run-pass | ||
// ignore-wasm32-bare: No panic messages | ||
// compile-flags: -C debug-assertions | ||
|
||
struct Misalignment { | ||
a: u32, | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn main() { | ||
let items: [Misalignment; 2] = [Misalignment { a: 0 }, Misalignment { a: 1 }]; | ||
unsafe { | ||
let ptr: *const Misalignment = items.as_ptr().cast::<u8>().add(1).cast::<Misalignment>(); | ||
let _ptr = core::ptr::addr_of!((*ptr).a); | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be good to have a comment here that these derefs (if unaligned) are UB according to the reference, but we choose to skip them here because there are still debates about whether we want to relax this UB later or not.
Also (while I am here), IMO
if let
without any binder is better replaced byif matches!
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we start this discussion? I see the logic, but I have seen a good amount of code that does this (in addition to the code in the stdlib I linked above), and AFAICT there's very little benefit to this UB in terms of optimizations it allows.
It's easy to misunderstand the way
addr_of
avoids alignment issues as being slightly broader than it actually intends to be, and most of this code also would have insufficient test coverage for the unaligned case (pretty often it crops up when C code doesn't guarantee that it will give you an aligned pointer, even though in practice it tends to do so).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@thomcc would you be willing to create a meeting proposal at https://github.com/rust-lang/opsem-team/ ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done: rust-lang/opsem-team#9