[perf] test MCP510

[lqd]

r? @ghost

[lqd]

Let's see if the bootstrapping cfgs are correctly set up.

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 793c8e6 with merge 4cb98396e9dc17fbe9b0da2b1bd35d9b05fff30c...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 4cb98396e9dc17fbe9b0da2b1bd35d9b05fff30c (4cb98396e9dc17fbe9b0da2b1bd35d9b05fff30c)

[lqd]

Let's see if the bootstrapping cfgs are correctly set up.

$  cargo +4cb98396e9dc17fbe9b0da2b1bd35d9b05fff30c build -q && readelf -p .comment ./target/debug/helloworld

String dump of section '.comment':
  [     0]  GCC: (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04.1) 11.3.0
  [    2d]  Linker: LLD 16.0.5

Looks like yes?

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4cb98396e9dc17fbe9b0da2b1bd35d9b05fff30c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Warning ⚠: The following benchmark(s) failed to build:

• rustc

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-34.1%	[-74.8%, -0.6%]	31
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-32.7%	[-74.0%, -3.7%]	74
All ❌✅ (primary)	-34.1%	[-74.8%, -0.6%]	31

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	27.8%	[21.9%, 33.7%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	27.8%	[21.9%, 33.7%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-32.3%	[-65.9%, -1.4%]	28
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-28.4%	[-64.8%, -3.3%]	73
All ❌✅ (primary)	-32.3%	[-65.9%, -1.4%]	28

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.6%	[0.6%, 2.4%]	20
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.4%, 1.1%]	61
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.1%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.6%	[0.6%, 2.4%]	20

Bootstrap: missing data

[lqd]

The data gathering is done so I'll close this for now, but may reopen to rerun crater on these new try artifacts.

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 54a5872 with merge 132ffbd...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 132ffbd (132ffbd364fad28fb149d152638dd67f0cfcb7b0)

[lqd]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 8c274aa with merge 0702a73...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 0702a73 (0702a7381910e7388fbfad6ceeebaa3e6a1e899d)

[lqd]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 007e42f with merge 66ec3c5...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 66ec3c5 (66ec3c5dd6edc632d3705e50241a41198291ec79)

[lqd]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 23ba37d with merge 635a66e...

[lqd]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit b155c37 with merge 47f1971...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 47f1971 (47f1971a8a640f83c0ea807c0c33e909bbb5b3f0)