Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coverage: Obtain the __llvm_covfun section name outside a per-function loop #114008

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2023

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

This section name is always constant for a given target, but obtaining it from LLVM requires a few intermediate allocations. There's no need to do so repeatedly from inside a per-function loop.

…ion loop

This section name is always constant for a given target, but obtaining it from
LLVM requires a few intermediate allocations. There's no need to do so
repeatedly from inside a per-function loop.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 24, 2023

r? @cjgillot

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 24, 2023
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot label +A-code-coverage

@rustbot rustbot added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label Jul 24, 2023
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 25, 2023

📌 Commit 01f3cc1 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 25, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#114008 (coverage: Obtain the `__llvm_covfun` section name outside a per-function loop)
 - rust-lang#114014 (builtin_macros: expect raw strings too)
 - rust-lang#114043 (docs(LazyLock): add example pass local LazyLock variable to struct)
 - rust-lang#114051 (Add regression test for invalid "unused const" in method)
 - rust-lang#114052 (Suggest `{Option,Result}::as_ref()` instead of `cloned()` in some cases)
 - rust-lang#114058 (Add help for crate arg when crate name is invalid)
 - rust-lang#114060 (abi: unsized field in union - assert to delay bug )

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 24e34e2 into rust-lang:master Jul 25, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Jul 25, 2023
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the covfun-section-name branch July 26, 2023 03:15
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#114008 (coverage: Obtain the `__llvm_covfun` section name outside a per-function loop)
 - rust-lang#114014 (builtin_macros: expect raw strings too)
 - rust-lang#114043 (docs(LazyLock): add example pass local LazyLock variable to struct)
 - rust-lang#114051 (Add regression test for invalid "unused const" in method)
 - rust-lang#114052 (Suggest `{Option,Result}::as_ref()` instead of `cloned()` in some cases)
 - rust-lang#114058 (Add help for crate arg when crate name is invalid)
 - rust-lang#114060 (abi: unsized field in union - assert to delay bug )

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants