Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bootstrap: inline format!() args (0) #114066

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Jul 25, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 25, 2023

This PR changes how LLVM is built. Consider updating src/bootstrap/download-ci-llvm-stamp.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr changed the title bootstrap: inline format!() args bootstrap: inline format!() args (0) Jul 25, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #114148) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot ready

@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

I'm always iffy about comments like these (llvm being build differently...), but I think this is fine?...

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 30, 2023

📌 Commit a0503a8 has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 30, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors rollup=iffy then, just in case

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 30, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a0503a8 with merge 483ef5f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 30, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: WaffleLapkin
Pushing 483ef5f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 30, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 483ef5f into rust-lang:master Jul 30, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Jul 30, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (483ef5f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.0% [-1.1%, -1.0%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.9% [4.9%, 4.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-2.9%, -2.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.8% [-6.8%, -3.6%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 651.392s -> 653.336s (0.30%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants