Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return ident for ExprField and PatField HIR nodes #115400

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2023

Conversation

gurry
Copy link
Contributor

@gurry gurry commented Aug 31, 2023

Fixes #115264

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 31, 2023

r? @TaKO8Ki

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 31, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 31, 2023
@gurry
Copy link
Contributor Author

gurry commented Sep 1, 2023

@rustbot review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 1, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

📌 Commit 19574d2 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 1, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 19574d2 with merge d3377034e17491eb3f672a871ddc1778d6acc04a...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job armhf-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 1, 2023
@gurry
Copy link
Contributor Author

gurry commented Sep 1, 2023

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

@gurry: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 1, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 19574d2 with merge 88d9b37...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 88d9b37 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 1, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 88d9b37 into rust-lang:master Sep 1, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (88d9b37): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.7% [-4.4%, -0.9%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.6% [-4.4%, 0.4%] 3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 630.791s -> 631.304s (0.08%)
Artifact size: 316.37 MiB -> 316.42 MiB (0.02%)

@gurry gurry deleted the issue-115264-ice branch September 2, 2023 05:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ICE: no name for HirId
7 participants