Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #115461

Closed
wants to merge 21 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 9 pull requests #115461

wants to merge 21 commits into from

Conversation

fmease
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease commented Sep 2, 2023

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Alex Zepeda and others added 21 commits August 1, 2023 15:54
On native builds `llvm-config` picks up `zlib` and this gets pased into
the rust build tools, but on cross builds `llvm-config` is explicitly
ignored as it contains information for the host system and cannot be
trusted to be accurate for the target system.

Both DragonFly and Solaris contain `zlib` in the base system, so this is
both a safe assumption and required for a successful cross build unless
`zlib` support is disabled in LLVM.

This is more or less in the same vein as rust-lang#75713 and rust-lang#75655.
As far as I know, this is always true already, but it's not in the text of the Option module docs, so I figured I'd bring this up to FCP it.
…-libz, r=cuviper

rustc_llvm: Link to `zlib` on dragonfly and solaris

On native builds `llvm-config` picks up `zlib` and this gets pased into
the rust build tools, but on cross builds `llvm-config` is explicitly
ignored as it contains information for the host system and cannot be
trusted to be accurate for the target system.

Both DragonFly and Solaris contain `zlib` in the base system, so this is
both a safe assumption and required for a successful cross build unless
`zlib` support is disabled in LLVM.

This is more or less in the same vein as rust-lang#75713 and rust-lang#75655.
Add alignment to the NPO guarantee

This PR [changes](rust-lang#114845 (comment)) "same size" to "same size and alignment" in the option module's null pointer optimization docs in <https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/#representation>.

As far as I know, this has been true for a long time in the actual rustc implementation, but it's not in the text of those docs, so I figured I'd bring this up to FCP it.

I also see no particular reason that we'd ever *want* to have higher alignment on these.  In many of the cases it's impossible, as the minimum alignment is already the size of the type, but even if we *could* do things like on 32-bit we could say that `NonZeroU64` is 4-align but `Option<NonZeroU64>` is 8-align, I just don't see any value in doing that, so feel completely fine closing this door for the few things on which the NPO is already guaranteed.  These are basically all primitives, and should end up with the same size & alignment as those primitives.

(There's no layout guarantee for something like `Option<[u8; 3]>`, where it'd be at least plausible to consider raising the alignment from 1 to 4 on, say, some hypothetical target that doesn't have efficient unaligned 4-byte load/stores.  And even if we ever did start to offer some kind of guarantee around such a type, I doubt we'd put it under the "null pointer" optimization header.)

Screenshots for the new examples:
![image](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/18526288/a7dbff42-50b4-462e-9e27-00d511b58763)
![image](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/18526288/dfd55288-80fb-419a-bc11-26198c27f9f9)
Use `OnceLock` for `SingleCache`

This uses `OnceLock` for `SingleCache` instead of `Lock<Option<T>>` so lookups are lock-free.

r? ``@cjgillot``
…upted, r=cuviper

kmc-solid: Fix `is_interrupted`

Follow-up to rust-lang#115228. Fixes a build error in [`*-kmc-solid_*`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/kmc-solid.html) Tier 3 targets.

```
error[E0603]: function `is_interrupted` is private
  --> library\std\src\sys\solid\mod.rs:77:12
   |
77 |     error::is_interrupted(code)
   |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ private function
   |
note: the function `is_interrupted` is defined here
  --> library\std\src\sys\solid\error.rs:35:1
   |
35 | fn is_interrupted(er: abi::ER) -> bool {
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
…rough, r=cjgillot

Fall through when resolving elided assoc const lifetimes

``@QuineDot`` makes a good point in rust-lang#115010 (comment) that we probably should not accept *more* code due to rust-lang#115011 even though that code will eventually become a forbid-warning in a few versions (rust-lang#115010 (comment)).

Fall through when walking thru the `AnonymousWarnToStatic` (renamed to `AnonymousWarn`) rib so that we can resolve as a fresh lifetime like we did before.
feat(std): Stabilize 'os_str_bytes' feature

Closes rust-lang#111544
Create a SMIR visitor

r? `@spastorino`

Doesn't have tests or examples yet, but I think we could land it and implement it for the rest of the types.
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) O-solid Operating System: SOLID O-unix Operating system: Unix-like O-windows Operating system: Windows S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 2, 2023
@fmease
Copy link
Member Author

fmease commented Sep 2, 2023

@bors r+ rollup=never p=9

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 2, 2023

📌 Commit f869e56 has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 2, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 2, 2023

⌛ Testing commit f869e56 with merge 610e1010c7a84027be5e8f5504ea090c1513a415...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job armhf-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 2, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 2, 2023
@fmease fmease closed this Sep 2, 2023
@fmease fmease deleted the rollup-qikd8py branch January 16, 2024 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) O-solid Operating System: SOLID O-unix Operating system: Unix-like O-windows Operating system: Windows rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.