Skip to content

Conversation

gurry
Copy link
Contributor

@gurry gurry commented Oct 11, 2023

Fixes #116293

Note sure if I should add tests because the issue occurs only for feature gates having associated issues and that set of feature gates will change unpredictably leading to an unnecessary churn in tests.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 11, 2023

r? @petrochenkov

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 11, 2023
@gurry gurry changed the title Fix duplicate note on platform_intrinsics feature gate Fix duplicate note on feature gates with associated issues Oct 11, 2023
@gurry gurry changed the title Fix duplicate note on feature gates with associated issues Fix duplicate note on internal feature gates with associated issues Oct 11, 2023
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2023
The BuiltinInternalFeatures gate already has a struct level #[note]
attribute. The additional note field in it caused a duplicate to be
displayed when it was set to Some(...) which happened when the
feature had an associated issue
@gurry gurry force-pushed the 116293-dup-note.rs branch from fdd691b to 66e643d Compare October 12, 2023 01:53
@gurry
Copy link
Contributor Author

gurry commented Oct 12, 2023

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 12, 2023
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 12, 2023

📌 Commit 66e643d has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 12, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 12, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 66e643d with merge 4f05e95...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 12, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 4f05e95 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 12, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 4f05e95 into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.75.0 milestone Oct 12, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4f05e95): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.7% [3.7%, 3.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-7.3% [-7.3%, -7.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 628.393s -> 626.317s (-0.33%)
Artifact size: 271.29 MiB -> 271.25 MiB (-0.01%)

@gurry gurry deleted the 116293-dup-note.rs branch October 12, 2023 13:42
bors-ferrocene bot added a commit to ferrocene/ferrocene that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
50: Automated pull from upstream `master` r=Dajamante a=github-actions[bot]


This PR pulls the following changes from the upstream repository:

* rust-lang/rust#116619
* rust-lang/rust#115964
* rust-lang/rust#116391
* rust-lang/rust#116510
* rust-lang/rust#116671
  * rust-lang/rust#116669
  * rust-lang/rust#116654
  * rust-lang/rust#116642
  * rust-lang/rust#116625
  * rust-lang/rust#116593
* rust-lang/rust#116649
* rust-lang/rust#116600
* rust-lang/rust#116628



Co-authored-by: Nadrieril <nadrieril+git@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott McMurray <scottmcm@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <17426603+bjorn3@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Nethercote <n.nethercote@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Co-authored-by: Georg Semmler <github@weiznich.de>
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume.gomez@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Gurinder Singh <frederick.the.fool@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bors <bors@rust-lang.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

duplicate note on platform_intrinsics feature gate
5 participants