Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add T: ?Sized to RwLockReadGuard and RwLockWriteGuard's Debug impls. #117138

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2023
Merged

Add T: ?Sized to RwLockReadGuard and RwLockWriteGuard's Debug impls. #117138

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2023

Conversation

zachs18
Copy link
Contributor

@zachs18 zachs18 commented Oct 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

For context, MutexGuard has + ?Sized on its Debug impl, and all three have + ?Sized on their Display impls.

It looks like the ?Sized was just missed when the impls were added (the impl for MutexGuard was added in the same PR (#38006) with support for T: Debug + ?Sized, and RwLock*Guards did allow T: ?Sized types already); the Display impls were added later (#42822) with support for T: Debug + ?Sized types.

I think this needs a T-libs-api FCP? I'm not sure if this also needs an ACP. If so I can make one.

These are changes to (stable) trait impls on stable types so will be insta-stable.

@rustbot label +T-libs-api

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 24, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 24, 2023
@zachs18 zachs18 mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Merged
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, so needs a completed FCP to proceed. and removed T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 29, 2023
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r? @dtolnay

@rustbot rustbot assigned dtolnay and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum Oct 29, 2023
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Oct 29, 2023

@rust-lang/libs-api:
@rfcbot fcp merge

As far as I can figure out, this was an unintended omission.

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Oct 29, 2023 •
edited by m-ou-se
Loading

Team member @dtolnay has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Oct 29, 2023
@dtolnay dtolnay added S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 30, 2023
@rfcbot rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels Nov 7, 2023
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Nov 7, 2023

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Nov 17, 2023
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Nov 17, 2023

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.

dtolnay
dtolnay approved these changes Nov 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Nov 17, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 17, 2023

📌 Commit 9e3c9a6 has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 17, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 9e3c9a6 with merge 1a740c3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: dtolnay
Pushing 1a740c3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 18, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 1a740c3 into rust-lang:master Nov 18, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 18, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1a740c3): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 1.2% [0.8%, 1.7%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -4.8% [-4.8%, -4.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -7.4% [-7.4%, -7.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 677.526s -> 675.978s (-0.23%)
Artifact size: 313.79 MiB -> 313.80 MiB (0.00%)

@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Dec 14, 2023
wip-sync pushed a commit to NetBSD/pkgsrc-wip that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2024
@he32
Add a package for rust version 1.76.0.
0e9a2a1 
Pkgsrc changes:
 * Adapt checksums and patches.

Upstream chnages:

Version 1.76.0 (2024-02-08)
==========================

Language
--------
- [Document Rust ABI compatibility between various types]
  (rust-lang/rust#115476)
- [Also: guarantee that char and u32 are ABI-compatible]
  (rust-lang/rust#118032)
- [Warn against ambiguous wide pointer comparisons]
  (rust-lang/rust#117758)

Compiler
--------
- [Lint pinned `#[must_use]` pointers (in particular, `Box<T>`
  where `T` is `#[must_use]`) in `unused_must_use`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#118054)
- [Soundness fix: fix computing the offset of an unsized field in
  a packed struct]
  (rust-lang/rust#118540)
- [Soundness fix: fix dynamic size/align computation logic for
  packed types with dyn Trait tail]
  (rust-lang/rust#118538)
- [Add `$message_type` field to distinguish json diagnostic outputs]
  (rust-lang/rust#115691)
- [Enable Rust to use the EHCont security feature of Windows]
  (rust-lang/rust#118013)
- [Add tier 3 {x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-msvc targets]
  (rust-lang/rust#118150)
- [Add tier 3 aarch64-apple-watchos target]
  (rust-lang/rust#119074)
- [Add tier 3 arm64e-apple-ios & arm64e-apple-darwin targets]
  (rust-lang/rust#115526)

Refer to Rust's [platform support page][platform-support-doc]
for more information on Rust's tiered platform support.

Libraries
---------
- [Add a column number to `dbg!()`]
  (rust-lang/rust#114962)
- [Add `std::hash::{DefaultHasher, RandomState}` exports]
  (rust-lang/rust#115694)
- [Fix rounding issue with exponents in fmt]
  (rust-lang/rust#116301)
- [Add T: ?Sized to `RwLockReadGuard` and `RwLockWriteGuard`'s Debug impls.]
  (rust-lang/rust#117138)
- [Windows: Allow `File::create` to work on hidden files]
  (rust-lang/rust#116438)

Stabilized APIs
---------------
- [`Arc::unwrap_or_clone`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/sync/struct.Arc.html#method.unwrap_or_clone)
- [`Rc::unwrap_or_clone`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/rc/struct.Rc.html#method.unwrap_or_clone)
- [`Result::inspect`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/result/enum.Result.html#method.inspect)
- [`Result::inspect_err`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/result/enum.Result.html#method.inspect_err)
- [`Option::inspect`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/option/enum.Option.html#method.inspect)
- [`type_name_of_val`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/any/fn.type_name_of_val.html)
- [`std::hash::{DefaultHasher, RandomState}`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/hash/index.html#structs)
  These were previously available only through `std::collections::hash_map`.
- [`ptr::{from_ref, from_mut}`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ptr/fn.from_ref.html)
- [`ptr::addr_eq`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ptr/fn.addr_eq.html)

Cargo
-----

See [Cargo release notes]
(https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#cargo-176-2024-02-08).

Rustdoc
-------
- [Don't merge cfg and doc(cfg) attributes for re-exports]
  (rust-lang/rust#113091)
- [rustdoc: allow resizing the sidebar / hiding the top bar]
  (rust-lang/rust#115660)
- [rustdoc-search: add support for traits and associated types]
  (rust-lang/rust#116085)
- [rustdoc: Add highlighting for comments in items declaration]
  (rust-lang/rust#117869)

Compatibility Notes
-------------------
- [Add allow-by-default lint for unit bindings]
  (rust-lang/rust#112380)
  This is expected to be upgraded to a warning by default in a future Rust
  release. Some macros emit bindings with type `()` with user-provided spans,
  which means that this lint will warn for user code.
- [Remove x86_64-sun-solaris target.]
  (rust-lang/rust#118091)
- [Remove asmjs-unknown-emscripten target]
  (rust-lang/rust#117338)
- [Report errors in jobserver inherited through environment variables]
  (rust-lang/rust#113730)
  This [may warn](rust-lang/rust#120515)
  on benign problems too.
- [Update the minimum external LLVM to 16.]
  (rust-lang/rust#117947)
- [Improve `print_tts`](rust-lang/rust#114571)
  This change can break some naive manual parsing of token trees
  in proc macro code which expect a particular structure after
  `.to_string()`, rather than just arbitrary Rust code.
- [Make `IMPLIED_BOUNDS_ENTAILMENT` into a hard error from a lint]
  (rust-lang/rust#117984)
- [Vec's allocation behavior was changed when collecting some iterators]
  (rust-lang/rust#110353)
  Allocation behavior is currently not specified, nevertheless
  changes can be surprising.
  See [`impl FromIterator for Vec`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#impl-FromIterator%3CT%3E-for-Vec%3CT%3E)
  for more details.
- [Properly reject `default` on free const items]
  (rust-lang/rust#117818)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dtolnay dtolnay dtolnay approved these changes

Assignees

@dtolnay dtolnay

Labels
disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, so needs a completed FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.76.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@zachs18 @rustbot @Mark-Simulacrum @dtolnay @rfcbot @bors @rust-timer @apiraino