Skip to content

memcpy assumptions: link to source showing that GCC makes the same assumption #117312

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2023
Merged

memcpy assumptions: link to source showing that GCC makes the same assumption #117312

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion library/core/src/lib.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@
//! assumptions about their semantics: For `memcpy`, `memmove`, `memset`, `memcmp`, and `bcmp`, if
//! the `n` parameter is 0, the function is assumed to not be UB. Furthermore, for `memcpy`, if
//! source and target pointer are equal, the function is assumed to not be UB.
//! (Note that these are [standard assumptions](https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993) among compilers.)
//! (Note that these are standard assumptions among compilers:
//! [clang](https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993) and [GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667) do the same.)
//! These functions are often provided by the system libc, but can also be provided by the
//! [compiler-builtins crate](https://crates.io/crates/compiler_builtins).
//! Note that the library does not guarantee that it will always make these assumptions, so Rust
Expand Down