Skip to content

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

r? @bjorn3

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 20, 2023
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not 100% on whether the last two are a good idea, see what you think.

@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented Nov 20, 2023

The first commit conflicts with #117584

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have removed the first commit, and addressed the comments about the remaining commits.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 22, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #118143) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

And remove the relevant getters on `Compiler` and `Queries`.
There is no real need for them to be separate.
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased to fix the conflicts.

@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented Nov 22, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 22, 2023

📌 Commit 971010e has been approved by bjorn3

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 22, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 22, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 971010e with merge a6b8ae5...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 22, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: bjorn3
Pushing a6b8ae5 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 22, 2023
@bors bors merged commit a6b8ae5 into rust-lang:master Nov 22, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 22, 2023
@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the queries-cleanups branch November 22, 2023 20:25
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a6b8ae5): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.8% [-0.8%, -0.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 676.065s -> 676.864s (0.12%)
Artifact size: 313.79 MiB -> 313.80 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants