Rollup of 6 pull requests #118836
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #118836
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LLVM commit llvm/llvm-project@1d608fc renamed the pass.
When making changes to the bootstrap that shouldn't change its behavior, this feature will help developers perform comparisons to check whether the bootstrap behavior has changed or not. This can also be used for different purposes. For example, allowing CI to dump the shims and upload them so that developers can download them and compare with their local dump to see if CI affects the bootstrap unexpectedly. Or, make CI perform comparisons on specific bootstrap tests to check for behavior changes between the master and PR branches. Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
To ensure deterministic results we must sort the dump lines. This is necessary because the order of rustc invocations different almost all the time. Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Adds a basic assembly test checking that each target can produce assembly and update the target tier policy to require this. Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
We don't really want to communicate with target maintainers via email. GitHub is where everything happens, people should have a GitHub account that can be pinged on issues. This doesn't necessarily have to be a strict rule, but edit the template to suggest this. The previous template made it look like we care about having an email address, which we do not.
…=clubby789 dump bootstrap shims When making changes to the bootstrap that shouldn't change its behavior, this feature will help developers perform comparisons to check whether the bootstrap behavior has changed or not. As an example, when removing Python from the bootstrap by migrating to Rust, this feature will be super useful for ensuring that the behavior remains unaffected. It will assist me in performing comparisons to verify that the bootstrap behavior and its outputs remains consistent throughout the migration process. This can also be used for different purposes. For example, allowing CI to dump the shims and upload them so that developers can download them and compare with their local dump to see if CI affects the bootstrap unexpectedly. Or, make CI perform comparisons on specific bootstrap tests to check for behavior changes between the master and PR branches.
…t, r=Mark-Simulacrum tests: add sanity-check assembly test for every target Adds a basic assembly test checking that each target can produce assembly and update the target tier policy to require this. cc rust-lang/compiler-team#655 r? ```@wesleywiser```
llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API change LLVM commit llvm/llvm-project@1d608fc renamed the pass. r? ```@nikic```
Edit target doc template to remove email We don't really want to communicate with target maintainers via email. GitHub is where everything happens, people should have a GitHub account that can be pinged on issues. This doesn't necessarily have to be a strict rule, but edit the template to suggest this. The previous template made it look like we care about having an email address, which we do not. r? ```@davidtwco```
Update table for linker-plugin-lto docs
…askrgr Fix again `rustc_codegen_gcc` tests Similar to rust-lang#118706 r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118647 (dump bootstrap shims) - rust-lang#118708 (tests: add sanity-check assembly test for every target) - rust-lang#118818 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API change) - rust-lang#118826 (Edit target doc template to remove email) - rust-lang#118827 (Update table for linker-plugin-lto docs) - rust-lang#118835 (Fix again `rustc_codegen_gcc` tests) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
rustc_codegen_gcctests #118835 (Fix againrustc_codegen_gcctests)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup