Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unify query canonicalization mode #118968

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

aliemjay
Copy link
Member

Exclude from canonicalization only the static lifetimes that appear in the param env because of #118965 . Any other occurrence can be canonicalized safely AFAICT.

r? @lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 15, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Dec 15, 2023

happy with this. I want to think about a way fix #118965 and completely remove the 'static special case, but this is a step in the right direction. Let's make sure there's no other dependency on the static specialcase.

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 707c4f9 with merge 7e4f74f...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2023
unify query canonicalization mode

Exclude from canonicalization only the static lifetimes that appear in the param env because of rust-lang#118965 . Any other occurrence can be canonicalized safely AFAICT.

r? `@lcnr`
query_state,
|tcx, param_env, query_state| {
// FIXME(#118965): We don't canonicalize the static lifetimes that appear in the
// `param_env` beacause they are treated differently by trait selection.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// `param_env` beacause they are treated differently by trait selection.
// `param_env` because they are treated differently by trait selection.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 7e4f74f (7e4f74fb8736fea8f455bb6e094122965ae8f4cd)

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Dec 15, 2023

@craterbot check

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

👌 Experiment pr-118968 created and queued.
🤖 Automatically detected try build 7e4f74f
🔍 You can check out the queue and this experiment's details.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 15, 2023
@aliemjay
Copy link
Member Author

aliemjay commented Dec 18, 2023

@rust-timer build 7e4f74f

@rust-timer

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 18, 2023
@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (7e4f74f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.0% [1.0%, 3.0%] 4
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.6% [2.7%, 4.9%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.7% [-2.2%, -1.1%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.0% [1.0%, 3.0%] 4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.6% [-0.6%, -0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.6% [-0.6%, -0.6%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.047s -> 671.504s (0.07%)
Artifact size: 312.39 MiB -> 312.40 MiB (0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 18, 2023
@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚧 Experiment pr-118968 is now running

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@aliemjay
Copy link
Member Author

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

👌 Experiment pr-118968-1 created and queued.
🤖 Automatically detected try build 7e4f74f
🔍 You can check out the queue and this experiment's details.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 Experiment pr-118968 is completed!
📊 25 regressed and 4 fixed (399777 total)
📰 Open the full report.

⚠️ If you notice any spurious failure please add them to the blacklist!
ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. labels Dec 27, 2023
@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚧 Experiment pr-118968-1 is now running

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 Experiment pr-118968-1 is completed!
📊 0 regressed and 0 fixed (25 total)
📰 Open the full report.

⚠️ If you notice any spurious failure please add them to the blacklist!
ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Jan 8, 2024

cc @rust-lang/types this PR changes the old canonicalization to always erase 'static unless it is in of the param_env. We have to keep 'static in the param_env itself due to #118965 in the old solver.

I don't think 'static impacts the solver in any other way after #102472, and I believe this to be a another step in the right direction. Given that this shouldn't impact the behavior in any way I am going to go ahead and merge this.

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 8, 2024

📌 Commit 707c4f9 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 8, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 707c4f9 with merge be00c5a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lcnr
Pushing be00c5a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 9, 2024
@bors bors merged commit be00c5a into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 9, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (be00c5a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.1% [0.5%, 4.2%] 7
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.0% [1.0%, 3.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.6% [-1.6%, -1.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.7% [-1.6%, 4.2%] 8

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 669.888s -> 669.477s (-0.06%)
Artifact size: 308.54 MiB -> 308.51 MiB (-0.01%)

@aliemjay aliemjay deleted the canon-static branch March 30, 2024 01:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants