Skip to content

DO NOT REVIEW. DO NOT MERGE. Prove that rustc_expected_cgu_reuse tests are broken #118971

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Enselic
Copy link
Member

@Enselic Enselic commented Dec 15, 2023

I will file a bug report about rustc_expected_cgu_reuse being broken.

I will refer to this CI run as proof in the soon-to-be-reported issue that it is broken. I have changed expected outcome, so CI should definitely not pass, but it will.

I also have a fix but I want to do things in the right order to make code review easier.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 15, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 15, 2023
@Enselic
Copy link
Member Author

Enselic commented Dec 15, 2023

Point proven: CI passed when it should not have passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants