Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test case for issue #7911 #11898

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jeremyletang
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #7911 report an ICE with self in macro in two methods with differing self mutability.

This seems to be solved now.

Closes #7911.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Pretty printing tests don't work so well with macros right now, so this just needs an // xfail-pretty directive at the top of the test.

Also, could you rebase into one commit? Thanks!

@jeremyletang
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it's okay.

@bors bors closed this in 5c5d995 Feb 1, 2014
@jeremyletang jeremyletang deleted the issue-7911 branch February 5, 2014 18:36
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2023
…s, r=Manishearth

Allow `allow`ing `upper_case_acronyms` on enum variants

Fixes rust-lang#7708

changelog: [`upper_case_acronyms`]: allow `allow`ing on enum variants
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can't use same self expression in macro in two methods with differing self mutability
2 participants