Clean up alloc::sync::Weak Clone implementation #119158
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since both return points (tail and early return) return the same expression and the only difference is whether inner is available, the code that does the atomic operations and checks on inner was moved into the if body and the only return is at the tail. Original comments preserved.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cuviper (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
LGTM! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119158 (Clean up alloc::sync::Weak Clone implementation) - rust-lang#119386 (fix typo in `IpAddr::to_canonical`) - rust-lang#119413 (solaris support on bootstrap lock) - rust-lang#119424 (Primitive docs: fix confusing `Send` in `&T`'s list) - rust-lang#119425 (Fix invalid check-cfg Cargo feature diagnostic help) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119158 - JohnTheCoolingFan:arc-weak-clone-pretty, r=cuviper Clean up alloc::sync::Weak Clone implementation Since both return points (tail and early return) return the same expression and the only difference is whether inner is available, the code that does the atomic operations and checks on inner was moved into the if body and the only return is at the tail. Original comments preserved.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since both return points (tail and early return) return the same expression and the only difference is whether inner is available, the code that does the atomic operations and checks on inner was moved into the if body and the only return is at the tail. Original comments preserved.