Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move UI issue tests to subdirectories #120439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

seqre
Copy link
Contributor

@seqre seqre commented Jan 28, 2024

I've moved issue tests numbered 1920, 3668, 5997, 23302, 32122, 40510, 57741, 71676, and 76077 to relevant better-named subdirectories (tracking issue #73494). The issues were chosen by having the highest number of files per issue.

I adjusted the ISSUES_ENTRY_LIMIT because tidy was shouting at me.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 28, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nnethercote (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 28, 2024
@seqre seqre changed the title Move more UI issue tests to subdirectories Move UI issue tests to subdirectories Jan 28, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Jan 28, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

tests/ui/issues/issues Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

The CI run is failing with:

tidy error: `ISSUES_ENTRY_LIMIT` is too high (is 1812, should be 1808)

so I guess that needs adjusting again.

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, these changes are useful progress on #73494. It looks mostly good, just a few comments to address above.

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 28, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@seqre
Copy link
Contributor Author

seqre commented Jan 29, 2024

I had this weird issue the local tidy check would show I have more files than what CI sees, but I made it work. I have applied all the suggestions.

@rustbot review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 29, 2024
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

I had this weird issue the local tidy check would show I have more files than what CI sees, but I made it work. I have applied all the suggestions.

You might have some non-committed files in that directory?

Anyway, doesn't affect the PR in general. Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 29, 2024

📌 Commit ae31de4 has been approved by nnethercote

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 29, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Jan 29, 2024

Could you please squash the commits into one?
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 29, 2024
Issue tests numbered 1920, 3668, 5997, 23302, 32122, 40510, 57741, 71676, and 76077 were moved to relevant better-named subdirectories. ISSUES_ENTRY_LIMIT was adjusted to match new number of files and FIXME note was expanded.
@seqre
Copy link
Contributor Author

seqre commented Jan 30, 2024

Commits are now squashed @fmease, as you asked!

@rustbot review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 30, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Jan 30, 2024

Thanks!
@bors r=nnethercote

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 30, 2024

📌 Commit ed55629 has been approved by nnethercote

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 30, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 18 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119123 (Add triagebot mentions entry for simd intrinsics)
 - rust-lang#119991 (Reject infinitely-sized reads from io::Repeat)
 - rust-lang#120172 (bootstrap: add more unit tests)
 - rust-lang#120250 (rustdoc: Prevent JS injection from localStorage)
 - rust-lang#120376 (Update codegen test for LLVM 18)
 - rust-lang#120387 (interpret/memory: fix safety comment for large array memset optimization)
 - rust-lang#120400 (Bound errors span label cleanup)
 - rust-lang#120402 (Make the coroutine def id of an async closure the child of the closure def id)
 - rust-lang#120403 (Add instructions of how to use pre-vendored 'rustc-src')
 - rust-lang#120424 (raw pointer metadata API: data address -> data pointer)
 - rust-lang#120425 (Remove unnecessary unit returns in query declarations)
 - rust-lang#120439 (Move UI issue tests to subdirectories)
 - rust-lang#120443 (Fixes footnote handling in rustdoc)
 - rust-lang#120452 (std: Update documentation of seek_write on Windows)
 - rust-lang#120460 (Be more careful about interpreting a label/lifetime as a mistyped char literal.)
 - rust-lang#120464 (Add matthewjasper to some review groups)
 - rust-lang#120467 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#120488 (Diagnostic lifetimes cleanups)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3524d8a into rust-lang:master Jan 30, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 30, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120439 - seqre-contrib:moving-ui-tests, r=nnethercote

Move UI issue tests to subdirectories

I've moved issue tests numbered 1920, 3668, 5997, 23302, 32122, 40510, 57741, 71676, and 76077 to relevant better-named subdirectories (tracking issue rust-lang#73494). The issues were chosen by having the highest number of files per issue.

I adjusted the `ISSUES_ENTRY_LIMIT` because `tidy` was shouting at me.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants