-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove some unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted
calls
#120735
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's never used.
When `catch_fatal_errors` catches a `FatalErrorMarker`, it returns an `ErrorGuaranteed` that is conjured out of thin air with `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted`. But that `ErrorGuaranteed` is never used. This commit changes it to instead conjure a `FatalError` out of thin air. (A non-deprecated action!) This makes more sense because `FatalError` and `FatalErrorMarker` are a natural pairing -- a `FatalErrorMarker` is created by calling `FatalError::raise`, so this is effectively getting back the original `FatalError`. This requires a tiny change in `catch_with_exit_code`. The old result of the `catch_fatal_errors` call there was `Result<Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed>, ErrorGuaranteed>` which could be `flatten`ed into `Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed>`. The new result of the `catch_fatal_errors` calls is `Result<Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed>, FatalError>`, which can't be `flatten`ed but is still easily matched for the success case.
By making non-unicode arguments a fatal error instead of a warning, we don't need to handle what comes after, which avoids the need for an `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` call.
`main_args` calls `from_matches`, which does lots of initialization. If anything goes wrong, `from_matches` emits an error message and returns `Err(1)` (or `Err(3)`). `main_args` then turns the `Err(1)` into `Err(ErrorGuaranteed)`, because that's what `catch_with_exit_code` requires on error. But `catch_with_exit_code` doesn't do anything with the `ErrorGuaranteed`, it just exits with `EXIT_FAILURE`. We can avoid the creation of the `ErrorGuaranteed` (which requires an undesirable `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` call), by changing `from_matches` to instead eagerly abort if anything goes wrong. The behaviour from the user's point of view is the same: an early abort with an `EXIT_FAILURE` exit code. And we can also simplify `from_matches` to return an `Option` instead of a `Result`: - Old `Err(0)` case --> `None` - Old `Err(_)` case --> fatal error. This requires similar changes to `ScrapeExamplesOptions::new` and `load_call_locations`.
- In `emit_producing_error_guaranteed`, only allow `Level::Error`. - In `emit_diagnostic`, only produce `ErrorGuaranteed` for `Level` and `DelayedBug`. (Not `Bug` or `Fatal`. They don't need it, because the relevant `emit` methods abort.) - Add/update various comments.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Feb 7, 2024
…teed`. It's more to-the-point.
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 7, 2024
Nadrieril
added a commit
to Nadrieril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
…ms, r=oli-obk Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls We want to drive the number of these calls down as much as possible. This PR gets rid of a bunch of them. r? `@oli-obk`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#110482 (Add armv8r-none-eabihf target for the Cortex-R52.) - rust-lang#119162 (Add unstable `-Z direct-access-external-data` cmdline flag for `rustc`) - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups) - rust-lang#120455 ( Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests) - rust-lang#120470 (Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect) - rust-lang#120479 (Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate) - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters) - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info) - rust-lang#120664 (Add parallel rustc ui tests) - rust-lang#120721 (fix `llvm_out` to use the correct LLVM root) - rust-lang#120726 (Don't use bashism in checktools.sh) - rust-lang#120733 (MirPass: make name more const) - rust-lang#120735 (Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls) Failed merges: - rust-lang#120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered") r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#110482 (Add armv8r-none-eabihf target for the Cortex-R52.) - rust-lang#119162 (Add unstable `-Z direct-access-external-data` cmdline flag for `rustc`) - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups) - rust-lang#120455 ( Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests) - rust-lang#120470 (Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect) - rust-lang#120479 (Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate) - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters) - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info) - rust-lang#120664 (Add parallel rustc ui tests) - rust-lang#120726 (Don't use bashism in checktools.sh) - rust-lang#120733 (MirPass: make name more const) - rust-lang#120735 (Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls) - rust-lang#120746 (Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120735 - nnethercote:rm-some-unchecked_claims, r=oli-obk Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls We want to drive the number of these calls down as much as possible. This PR gets rid of a bunch of them. r? ``@oli-obk``
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We want to drive the number of these calls down as much as possible. This PR gets rid of a bunch of them.
r? @oli-obk