Skip to content

Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error #120865

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2024
+11 −1
Merged

Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error #120865

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/messages.ftl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ codegen_ssa_no_module_named =
codegen_ssa_no_natvis_directory = error enumerating natvis directory: {$error}
codegen_ssa_no_saved_object_file = cached cgu {$cgu_name} should have an object file, but doesn't
codegen_ssa_processing_dymutil_failed = processing debug info with `dsymutil` failed: {$status}
.note = {$output}
Expand Down
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/write.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -913,7 +913,9 @@ fn execute_copy_from_cache_work_item<B: ExtraBackendMethods>(

let object = load_from_incr_comp_dir(
cgcx.output_filenames.temp_path(OutputType::Object, Some(&module.name)),
module.source.saved_files.get("o").expect("no saved object file in work product"),
module.source.saved_files.get("o").unwrap_or_else(|| {
cgcx.create_dcx().emit_fatal(errors::NoSavedObjectFile { cgu_name: &module.name })
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is "CGU" the rustc term for what LLVM calls a "module"? I'm trying to understand the cgu_name/module.name inconsistency here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think that's what's going on here. I decided to call this a CGU name based on how CachedModuleCodegen are created:

rust/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/base.rs

Lines 770 to 773 in b5c46dc

CachedModuleCodegen {
name: cgu.name().to_string(),
source: cgu.previous_work_product(tcx),
},

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

}),
);
let dwarf_object =
module.source.saved_files.get("dwo").as_ref().and_then(|saved_dwarf_object_file| {
Expand Down
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/errors.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ pub struct NoNatvisDirectory {
pub error: Error,
}

#[derive(Diagnostic)]
#[diag(codegen_ssa_no_saved_object_file)]
pub struct NoSavedObjectFile<'a> {
pub cgu_name: &'a str,
}

#[derive(Diagnostic)]
#[diag(codegen_ssa_copy_path_buf)]
pub struct CopyPathBuf {
Expand Down