-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add another test for promoteds-in-static #120970
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Feb 12, 2024
Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
RalfJung
changed the title
Static promoted test
add another test for promoteds-in-static
Feb 12, 2024
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
static-promoted-test
branch
from
February 12, 2024 14:22
aafcdda
to
91709b3
Compare
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
static-promoted-test
branch
from
February 12, 2024 14:27
91709b3
to
a313ffb
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 12, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
…li-obk add another test for promoteds-in-static rust-lang#119614 led to validation of promoteds recursing into statics. These statics can point to `static mut` and interior mutable `static` and do other things we don't allow in `const`, but promoteds are validated as `const`, so we get strange errors (saying "in `const`" when there is no const) and surprising validation failures. rust-lang#120960 fixes that; this here adds another test. r? `@oli-obk` Fixes rust-lang#120968
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118983 (Warn on references casting to bigger memory layout) - rust-lang#119451 (Gate PR CI on clippy correctness lints) - rust-lang#120273 (compiletest: few naive improvements) - rust-lang#120889 (Implement Instant for UEFI) - rust-lang#120938 (Implement sys/thread for UEFI) - rust-lang#120950 (Fix async closures in CTFE) - rust-lang#120958 (Dejargonize `subst`) - rust-lang#120965 (Add lahfsahf and prfchw target feature) - rust-lang#120970 (add another test for promoteds-in-static) - rust-lang#120979 (Update books) Failed merges: - rust-lang#120973 (allow static_mut_ref in some tests that specifically test mutable statics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118983 (Warn on references casting to bigger memory layout) - rust-lang#119451 (Gate PR CI on clippy correctness lints) - rust-lang#120273 (compiletest: few naive improvements) - rust-lang#120950 (Fix async closures in CTFE) - rust-lang#120958 (Dejargonize `subst`) - rust-lang#120965 (Add lahfsahf and prfchw target feature) - rust-lang#120970 (add another test for promoteds-in-static) - rust-lang#120979 (Update books) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120970 - RalfJung:static-promoted-test, r=oli-obk add another test for promoteds-in-static rust-lang#119614 led to validation of promoteds recursing into statics. These statics can point to `static mut` and interior mutable `static` and do other things we don't allow in `const`, but promoteds are validated as `const`, so we get strange errors (saying "in `const`" when there is no const) and surprising validation failures. rust-lang#120960 fixes that; this here adds another test. r? ``@oli-obk`` Fixes rust-lang#120968
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#119614 led to validation of promoteds recursing into statics. These statics can point to
static mut
and interior mutablestatic
and do other things we don't allow inconst
, but promoteds are validated asconst
, so we get strange errors (saying "inconst
" when there is no const) and surprising validation failures.#120960 fixes that; this here adds another test.
r? @oli-obk
Fixes #120968