-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #121896
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #121896
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
After desugaring, `let` expressions should only appear inside `if` expressions or `match` guards, possibly nested within a let-chain. In both cases they are specifically handled by the lowerings of those expressions, so this case is currently unreachable.
fix typo in documentation for std::fs::Permissions Please check and re-check this PR carefully to see if I got this right. But by my logic, if the `read_only` function returns `true`, I would not expect be able to write to the file (it being read only); so this text is meant to clarify that `read_only` being `false` doesn't mean *you* can actually write to the file, just that "in general" someone is able to.
Update E0716.md for clarity When reading through this, I got slightly hung up thinking the `let` it was referring to was the `let tmp` on line 25, which was confusing considering the comment states that the temporary is freed at the end of the block. I think adding this clarification could potentially help some beginners like myself without being overly verbose.
attempt to further clarify addr_of docs
…est31 Move `gather_comments`. To the module where it is used, so it doesn't have to be `pub`. r? ````@est31````
Move `HandleStore` into `server.rs`. This just moves the server-relevant parts of handles into `server.rs`. It introduces a new higher-order macro `with_api_handle_types` to avoid some duplication. This fixes two `FIXME` comments, and makes things clearer, by not having server code in `client.rs`. r? ````@bjorn3````
…=cuviper Remove hidden use of Global Fixes rust-lang#121797
…les, r=workingjubilee Use the guaranteed precision of a couple of float functions in docs
…r-errors Account for unmet T: !Copy in E0277 message ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied --> $DIR/simple.rs:10:16 | LL | not_copy::<T>(); | ^ the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied ``` instead of the current ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied --> $DIR/simple.rs:10:16 | LL | not_copy::<T>(); | ^ the trait `!Copy` is not implemented for `T` ```
style library/core/src/error.rs Add an extra blank line for clarity in distinguishing implementations.
The ordinary lowering of `thir::ExprKind::Let` is unreachable After desugaring, `let` expressions should only appear inside `if` expressions or `match` guards, possibly nested within a let-chain. In both cases they are specifically handled by the lowerings of those expressions, so this case is currently unreachable. --- Context: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Lowering.20of.20.60thir.3A.3AExprKind.3A.3ALet.60.20is.20unreachable My conclusions are partly based on the observation that stubbing out this match arm doesn't cause any test failures. So either this really is unreachable, or it can be reached in some obscure circumstances that our test suite doesn't cover. If we end up needing this code (or something like it) for an implementation of rust-lang/rfcs#3573, it should be easy enough to pull it back out of version control history. I looked into having the `if`/`match` lowerings call back into `expr_into_dest`, but from what I can tell that won't work well, because there are extra scoping considerations that require some awareness of the enclosing if/match. r? `@Nadrieril`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Mar 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
gather_comments
. #121815 (Movegather_comments
.)HandleStore
intoserver.rs
. #121835 (MoveHandleStore
intoserver.rs
.)thir::ExprKind::Let
is unreachable #121892 (The ordinary lowering ofthir::ExprKind::Let
is unreachable)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup