Weekly cargo update

[github-actions]

Automation to keep dependencies in Cargo.lock current.

The following is the output from cargo update:

    Updating ahash v0.8.10 -> v0.8.11
    Updating anyhow v1.0.80 -> v1.0.81
    Updating basic-toml v0.1.8 -> v0.1.9
    Updating bumpalo v3.15.3 -> v3.15.4
      Adding cfg_aliases v0.1.1
    Updating chrono v0.4.34 -> v0.4.35
    Updating clap v4.5.1 -> v4.5.3
    Updating clap_builder v4.5.1 -> v4.5.2
    Updating clap_derive v4.5.0 -> v4.5.3
    Updating color-eyre v0.6.2 -> v0.6.3
    Updating ctrlc v3.4.2 -> v3.4.4
    Updating env_logger v0.11.2 -> v0.11.3
    Updating h2 v0.3.24 -> v0.3.25
      Adding heck v0.5.0
    Updating http v0.2.11 -> v0.2.12
    Updating js-sys v0.3.68 -> v0.3.69
    Updating libloading v0.8.2 -> v0.8.3
    Updating new_debug_unreachable v1.0.4 -> v1.0.6
    Updating nix v0.27.1 -> v0.28.0
    Updating proc-macro2 v1.0.78 -> v1.0.79
    Updating reqwest v0.11.24 -> v0.11.26
    Updating syn v2.0.52 -> v2.0.53
    Updating sysinfo v0.30.6 -> v0.30.7
    Updating thiserror v1.0.57 -> v1.0.58
    Updating thiserror-impl v1.0.57 -> v1.0.58
    Updating wasm-bindgen v0.2.91 -> v0.2.92
    Updating wasm-bindgen-backend v0.2.91 -> v0.2.92
    Updating wasm-bindgen-futures v0.4.41 -> v0.4.42
    Updating wasm-bindgen-macro v0.2.91 -> v0.2.92
    Updating wasm-bindgen-macro-support v0.2.91 -> v0.2.92
    Updating wasm-bindgen-shared v0.2.91 -> v0.2.92
    Updating web-sys v0.3.68 -> v0.3.69

[rustbot]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

• @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
• @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

[rustbot]

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[clubby789]

@bors r+ rollup=never

[bors]

📌 Commit c486d2d has been approved by clubby789

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit c486d2d with merge 1eb882e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: clubby789
Pushing 1eb882e to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (1eb882e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[1.9%, 2.6%]	8
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.8%	[2.3%, 7.0%]	8
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.5%	[-3.5%, -3.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.5%	[-4.5%, -4.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.5%	[-3.5%, 2.6%]	9

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	6.1%	[3.0%, 9.1%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 668.845s -> 666.919s (-0.29%)
Artifact size: 312.75 MiB -> 312.80 MiB (0.01%)

[saethlin]

This PR just added new dependencies. Don't we have a review/approval process for that???

[clubby789]

There's a tidy check - PR CI doesn't seem to get run on these so I ran it locally and didn't get any complaints

[saethlin]

Ouch. If we have checks only in PR CI, that's a second problem.

[clubby789]

The new dependency is via Miri (ctrlc -> nix -> cfg_aliases (build dep) - it looks like we only check dependencies of rustc-main

[saethlin]

Ahhhhhh I see. I was concerned that the dependency changes in #111769 could slip past because of this PR but of course even though that PR now has less lockfile changes it still has the changes to the list in tidy. Got it.