Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pile of rustdoc issue fixes #12339

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2014
Merged

Pile of rustdoc issue fixes #12339

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2014

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Commits have the details

@sfackler
Copy link
Member

I don't know if you want to leave the macro export check in or not. r=me either way.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @huonw

Pages aren't emitted for enum variants, so whenever we're linking to an enum
variant instead link to the parent enum instead.

Closes rust-lang#12289
Any macro tagged with #[macro_export] will be showed in the documentation for
that module. This also documents all the existing macros inside of std::macros.

Closes rust-lang#3163
cc rust-lang#5605
Closes rust-lang#9954
This helps figure out where you actually jumped to, especially if the thing you
jumped to is at the very bottom of the page.

Closes rust-lang#9905
Turns out a hash map with integer keys isn't serializable to json.

Closes rust-lang#10115
Useful for getting the link to a method or function.

Closes rust-lang#10332
When building up our path cache, we don't plaster over a path which was
previously inserted if we're inserting a non-public-item thing.

Closes rust-lang#11678
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2014
@bors bors closed this Feb 19, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 429ef87 into rust-lang:master Feb 19, 2014
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the rustdoc-fixes branch February 19, 2014 18:27
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…en_check, r=llogiq

Add new `unnecessary_get_then_check` lint

No issue linked to this as far as I can see. It's a lint I discovered that could be added when I worked on another lint.

r? `@llogiq`

changelog: Add new `unnecessary_get_then_check` lint
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants