update compiler_builtins to 0.1.109

[RalfJung]

This pulls in rust-lang/compiler-builtins#583 so we should make sure that does not come with any perf surprises.

Cc @Amanieu

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[RalfJung]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 385c363 with merge 4e5df4d...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 4e5df4d (4e5df4d944249b5cdc120cbbc93f85165ec6c8de)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4e5df4d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.1%	[3.1%, 3.1%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-2.7%, 3.1%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 674.485s -> 674.163s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 318.39 MiB -> 318.36 MiB (-0.01%)

[RalfJung]

That looks good. :)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 385c363 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 385c363 with merge 5525627...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job aarch64-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[RUSTC-TIMING] lazy_static test:false 0.108
[RUSTC-TIMING] build_script_build test:false 0.684
   Compiling derive_more v0.99.17
   Compiling darling_core v0.20.8
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[RalfJung]

@bors retry " Error: The operation was canceled."

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 385c363 with merge 4a0cacd...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job x86_64-gnu-aux failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[RalfJung]

Looks like an instance of #123583.
@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 385c363 with merge 29b1207...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 29b1207 to master...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 29b1207 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (29b1207): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 677.239s -> 677.423s (0.03%)
Artifact size: 315.99 MiB -> 316.04 MiB (0.01%)