Skip to content

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

The new methodology can be found in the re-worded comment, but the gist of it is
that -C prefer-dynamic doesn't turn off static linkage. The error messages
should also be a little more sane now.

Closes #12133

The new methodology can be found in the re-worded comment, but the gist of it is
that -C prefer-dynamic doesn't turn off static linkage. The error messages
should also be a little more sane now.

Closes rust-lang#12133
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

This is the first half of #12164, I'm trying to land it separately to see if I can diagnose the problem.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2014
The new methodology can be found in the re-worded comment, but the gist of it is
that -C prefer-dynamic doesn't turn off static linkage. The error messages
should also be a little more sane now.

Closes #12133
@bors bors closed this Feb 20, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 35c6e22 into rust-lang:master Feb 20, 2014
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the rlibs-and-dylibs-2 branch February 20, 2014 17:13
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
…s, r=Manishearth

bug fix: lint numbered_fields message error

fixes rust-lang#12367

changelog: [`numbered_fields`]: fix macro expand message error.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

prefer-dynamic has bad error messages when rlibs are available

2 participants