-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coverage: Branch coverage tests for lazy boolean operators #124053
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
A-code-coverage
Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)
labels
Apr 17, 2024
Swatinem
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2024
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Apr 20, 2024
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2024
…lacrum coverage: Branch coverage tests for lazy boolean operators The current branch coverage implementation already supports the `&&` and `||` operators (even outside of an `if` condition), as a natural consequence of how they are desugared/lowered, but we didn't have any specific tests for them. This PR adds some appropriate tests. I've also moved the existing branch coverage tests into a `coverage/branch` subdirectory, so that they don't become unwieldy as I add more branch coverage tests. `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2024
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123379 (Print note with closure signature on type mismatch) - rust-lang#123967 (static_mut_refs: use raw pointers to remove the remaining FIXME) - rust-lang#123976 (Use fake libc in core test) - rust-lang#123986 (lint-docs: Add redirects for renamed lints.) - rust-lang#124053 (coverage: Branch coverage tests for lazy boolean operators) - rust-lang#124071 (Add llvm-bitcode-linker to build manifest) - rust-lang#124103 (Improve std::fs::Metadata Debug representation) - rust-lang#124132 (llvm RustWrapper: explain OpBundlesIndirect argument type) - rust-lang#124191 (Give a name to each distinct manipulation of pretty-printer FixupContext) - rust-lang#124193 (Miri subtree update) - rust-lang#124196 (mir-opt tests: rename unit-test -> test-mir-pass) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2024
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123379 (Print note with closure signature on type mismatch) - rust-lang#123967 (static_mut_refs: use raw pointers to remove the remaining FIXME) - rust-lang#123976 (Use fake libc in core test) - rust-lang#123986 (lint-docs: Add redirects for renamed lints.) - rust-lang#124053 (coverage: Branch coverage tests for lazy boolean operators) - rust-lang#124071 (Add llvm-bitcode-linker to build manifest) - rust-lang#124103 (Improve std::fs::Metadata Debug representation) - rust-lang#124132 (llvm RustWrapper: explain OpBundlesIndirect argument type) - rust-lang#124191 (Give a name to each distinct manipulation of pretty-printer FixupContext) - rust-lang#124196 (mir-opt tests: rename unit-test -> test-mir-pass) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124053 - Zalathar:lazy-boolean, r=Mark-Simulacrum coverage: Branch coverage tests for lazy boolean operators The current branch coverage implementation already supports the `&&` and `||` operators (even outside of an `if` condition), as a natural consequence of how they are desugared/lowered, but we didn't have any specific tests for them. This PR adds some appropriate tests. I've also moved the existing branch coverage tests into a `coverage/branch` subdirectory, so that they don't become unwieldy as I add more branch coverage tests. ``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage
Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage)
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current branch coverage implementation already supports the
&&
and||
operators (even outside of anif
condition), as a natural consequence of how they are desugared/lowered, but we didn't have any specific tests for them. This PR adds some appropriate tests.I've also moved the existing branch coverage tests into a
coverage/branch
subdirectory, so that they don't become unwieldy as I add more branch coverage tests.@rustbot label +A-code-coverage