Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump bootstrap compiler to latest beta #124521

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-t-2-day-tuesday

This also cherry-picks d716d72 from the beta branching, to continue to workaround #122758.

r? bootstrap

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 29, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 29, 2024

Some changes occurred to the platform-builtins intrinsics. Make sure the
LLVM backend as well as portable-simd gets adapted for the changes.

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez, @bjorn3, @calebzulawski, @programmerjake

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@albertlarsan68 albertlarsan68 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, please ping me when the CI is green!

This is a workaround for rust-lang#122758, but it's not clear why 1.79 requires a
more extensive amount of no_inline than the previous release. Seems like
there's something relatively subtle happening here.
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@albertlarsan68 albertlarsan68 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR!

@albertlarsan68
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 2, 2024

📌 Commit 44988e2 has been approved by albertlarsan68

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 2, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 2, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 44988e2 with merge f5efc3c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 2, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: albertlarsan68
Pushing f5efc3c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 2, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f5efc3c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.8% [-0.8%, -0.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.4% [-1.4%, -1.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.4%, -2.4%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.4% [-1.4%, -1.4%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.059s -> 675.937s (0.73%)
Artifact size: 315.99 MiB -> 315.99 MiB (-0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants