Update libc to 0.2.155

[madsmtm]

Motivation: To fix -Zbuild-std / Xargo for visionOS targets.

EDIT: Blocked on rust-lang/libc#3608 / rust-lang/libc#3609 rust-lang/libc#3682 and rust-lang/libc#3690 No longer blocked.

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[madsmtm]

This failed with an odd memory violation, since I'm using a mac, I bisected this using the CI to be caused by rust-lang/libc#3602. An issue is filed upstream in rust-lang/libc#3608, with a fix in rust-lang/libc#3609.

@rustbot blocked

[madsmtm]

@rustbot ready

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 74012d5 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 74012d5 with merge f092f73...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing f092f73 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (f092f73): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -4.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.3%	[-4.3%, -4.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.8%	[2.5%, 3.1%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 670.193s -> 671.026s (0.12%)
Artifact size: 316.05 MiB -> 316.08 MiB (0.01%)