Use ObligationCtxt in favor of TraitEngine in many more places

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/autoderef.rs

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 use crate::errors::AutoDerefReachedRecursionLimit;
+use crate::traits;
 use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt;
-use crate::traits::{self, TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
 use rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt;
 use rustc_middle::ty::TypeVisitableExt;
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt};
 use rustc_session::Limit;
 use rustc_span::def_id::LocalDefId;
 use rustc_span::def_id::LOCAL_CRATE;
 use rustc_span::Span;
-use rustc_trait_selection::traits::StructurallyNormalizeExt;
+use rustc_trait_selection::traits::ObligationCtxt;
 
 #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
 pub enum AutoderefKind {
@@ -167,25 +167,19 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Autoderef<'a, 'tcx> {
         &self,
         ty: Ty<'tcx>,
     ) -> Option<(Ty<'tcx>, Vec<traits::PredicateObligation<'tcx>>)> {
-        let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(self.infcx);
-
-        let cause = traits::ObligationCause::misc(self.span, self.body_id);
-        let normalized_ty = match self
-            .infcx
-            .at(&cause, self.param_env)
-            .structurally_normalize(ty, &mut *fulfill_cx)
-        {
-            Ok(normalized_ty) => normalized_ty,
-            Err(errors) => {
-                // This shouldn't happen, except for evaluate/fulfill mismatches,
-                // but that's not a reason for an ICE (`predicate_may_hold` is conservative
-                // by design).
-                debug!(?errors, "encountered errors while fulfilling");
-                return None;
-            }
+        let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self.infcx);
+        let Ok(normalized_ty) = ocx.structurally_normalize(
+            &traits::ObligationCause::misc(self.span, self.body_id),
+            self.param_env,
+            ty,
+        ) else {
+            // We shouldn't have errors here, except for evaluate/fulfill mismatches,
+            // but that's not a reason for an ICE (`predicate_may_hold` is conservative
+            // by design).
+            // FIXME(-Znext-solver): This *actually* shouldn't happen then.
+            return None;
         };
-
-        let errors = fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(self.infcx);
+        let errors = ocx.select_where_possible();
         if !errors.is_empty() {
             // This shouldn't happen, except for evaluate/fulfill mismatches,
             // but that's not a reason for an ICE (`predicate_may_hold` is conservative
@@ -194,7 +188,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Autoderef<'a, 'tcx> {
             return None;
         }
 
-        Some((normalized_ty, fulfill_cx.pending_obligations()))
+        Some((normalized_ty, ocx.into_pending_obligations()))
     }
 
     /// Returns the final type we ended up with, which may be an inference

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/coercion.rs

@@ -45,8 +45,7 @@ use rustc_hir::Expr;
 use rustc_hir_analysis::hir_ty_lowering::HirTyLowerer;
 use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::TypeVariableOrigin;
 use rustc_infer::infer::{Coercion, DefineOpaqueTypes, InferOk, InferResult};
-use rustc_infer::traits::TraitEngineExt as _;
-use rustc_infer::traits::{IfExpressionCause, MatchExpressionArmCause, TraitEngine};
+use rustc_infer::traits::{IfExpressionCause, MatchExpressionArmCause};
 use rustc_infer::traits::{Obligation, PredicateObligation};
 use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
 use rustc_middle::traits::BuiltinImplSource;
@@ -65,7 +64,6 @@ use rustc_trait_selection::infer::InferCtxtExt as _;
 use rustc_trait_selection::traits::error_reporting::suggestions::TypeErrCtxtExt;
 use rustc_trait_selection::traits::error_reporting::TypeErrCtxtExt as _;
 use rustc_trait_selection::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt;
-use rustc_trait_selection::traits::TraitEngineExt as _;
 use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{
     self, NormalizeExt, ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode, ObligationCtxt,
 };
@@ -164,11 +162,10 @@ impl<'f, 'tcx> Coerce<'f, 'tcx> {
             // Filter these cases out to make sure our coercion is more accurate.
             match res {
                 Ok(InferOk { value, obligations }) if self.next_trait_solver() => {
-                    let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(self);
-                    fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(self, obligations);
-                    let errs = fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(self);
-                    if errs.is_empty() {
-                        Ok(InferOk { value, obligations: fulfill_cx.pending_obligations() })
+                    let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self);
+                    ocx.register_obligations(obligations);
+                    if ocx.select_where_possible().is_empty() {
+                        Ok(InferOk { value, obligations: ocx.into_pending_obligations() })
                     } else {
                         Err(TypeError::Mismatch)
                     }
@@ -631,13 +628,12 @@ impl<'f, 'tcx> Coerce<'f, 'tcx> {
                 // but we need to constrain vars before processing goals mentioning
                 // them.
                 Some(ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(..)) => {
-                    let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(self);
-                    fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(self, obligation);
-                    let errs = fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(self);
-                    if !errs.is_empty() {
+                    let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self);
+                    ocx.register_obligation(obligation);
+                    if !ocx.select_where_possible().is_empty() {
                         return Err(TypeError::Mismatch);
                     }
-                    coercion.obligations.extend(fulfill_cx.pending_obligations());
+                    coercion.obligations.extend(ocx.into_pending_obligations());
                     continue;
                 }
                 _ => {

compiler/rustc_infer/src/traits/mod.rs

@@ -206,6 +206,18 @@ impl<'tcx> FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
     ) -> FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
         FulfillmentError { obligation, code, root_obligation }
     }
+
+    pub fn is_true_error(&self) -> bool {
+        match self.code {
+            FulfillmentErrorCode::SelectionError(_)
+            | FulfillmentErrorCode::ProjectionError(_)
+            | FulfillmentErrorCode::SubtypeError(_, _)
+            | FulfillmentErrorCode::ConstEquateError(_, _) => true,
+            FulfillmentErrorCode::Cycle(_) | FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: _ } => {
+                false
+            }
+        }
+    }
 }
 
 impl<'tcx> PolyTraitObligation<'tcx> {

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/infer.rs

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
 use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt as _;
-use crate::traits::{self, ObligationCtxt, SelectionContext, TraitEngineExt as _};
+use crate::traits::{self, ObligationCtxt, SelectionContext};
+
 use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
 use rustc_hir::lang_items::LangItem;
-use rustc_infer::traits::{Obligation, TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt as _};
+use rustc_infer::traits::Obligation;
 use rustc_macros::extension;
 use rustc_middle::arena::ArenaAllocatable;
 use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::{Canonical, CanonicalQueryResponse, QueryResponse};
@@ -93,9 +94,9 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
                 ty::TraitRef::new(self.tcx, trait_def_id, [ty]),
             )) {
                 Ok(Some(selection)) => {
-                    let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(self);
-                    fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(self, selection.nested_obligations());
-                    Some(fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(self))
+                    let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(self);
+                    ocx.register_obligations(selection.nested_obligations());
+                    Some(ocx.select_all_or_error())
                 }
                 Ok(None) | Err(_) => None,
             }

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/analyse.rs

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ use rustc_ast_ir::visit::VisitorResult;
 use rustc_infer::infer::resolve::EagerResolver;
 use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::TypeVariableOrigin;
 use rustc_infer::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, InferOk};
-use rustc_infer::traits::{TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
 use rustc_macros::extension;
 use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::ConstVariableOrigin;
 use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
@@ -26,9 +25,9 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::TypeFoldable;
 use rustc_span::{Span, DUMMY_SP};
 
 use crate::solve::eval_ctxt::canonical;
-use crate::solve::FulfillmentCtxt;
 use crate::solve::{EvalCtxt, GoalEvaluationKind, GoalSource};
 use crate::solve::{GenerateProofTree, InferCtxtEvalExt};
+use crate::traits::ObligationCtxt;
 
 pub struct InspectConfig {
     pub max_depth: usize,
@@ -74,14 +73,13 @@ impl<'tcx> NormalizesToTermHack<'tcx> {
             .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, self.term, self.unconstrained_term)
             .map_err(|_| NoSolution)
             .and_then(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
-                let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentCtxt::new(infcx);
-                fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations);
-                if fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(infcx).is_empty() {
-                    if fulfill_cx.pending_obligations().is_empty() {
-                        Ok(Certainty::Yes)
-                    } else {
-                        Ok(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
-                    }
+                let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
+                ocx.register_obligations(obligations);
+                let errors = ocx.select_all_or_error();
+                if errors.is_empty() {
+                    Ok(Certainty::Yes)
+                } else if errors.iter().all(|e| !e.is_true_error()) {
+                    Ok(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
                 } else {
                     Err(NoSolution)
                 }

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs

@@ -6,12 +6,9 @@
 
 use crate::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment;
 use crate::infer::InferOk;
-use crate::regions::InferCtxtRegionExt;
 use crate::solve::inspect::{InspectGoal, ProofTreeInferCtxtExt, ProofTreeVisitor};
-use crate::solve::{deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics, inspect, FulfillmentCtxt};
-use crate::traits::engine::TraitEngineExt as _;
+use crate::solve::{deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics, inspect};
 use crate::traits::select::IntercrateAmbiguityCause;
-use crate::traits::structural_normalize::StructurallyNormalizeExt;
 use crate::traits::NormalizeExt;
 use crate::traits::SkipLeakCheck;
 use crate::traits::{
@@ -22,7 +19,7 @@ use rustc_errors::{Diag, EmissionGuarantee};
 use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
 use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
 use rustc_infer::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, TyCtxtInferExt};
-use rustc_infer::traits::{util, FulfillmentErrorCode, TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
+use rustc_infer::traits::{util, FulfillmentErrorCode};
 use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
 use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{CandidateSource, Certainty, Goal};
 use rustc_middle::traits::specialization_graph::OverlapMode;
@@ -35,6 +32,7 @@ use std::fmt::Debug;
 use std::ops::ControlFlow;
 
 use super::error_reporting::suggest_new_overflow_limit;
+use super::ObligationCtxt;
 
 /// Whether we do the orphan check relative to this crate or to some remote crate.
 #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
@@ -361,23 +359,27 @@ fn impl_intersection_has_impossible_obligation<'a, 'cx, 'tcx>(
     let infcx = selcx.infcx;
 
     if infcx.next_trait_solver() {
-        let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentCtxt::new(infcx);
-        fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations.iter().cloned());
-
+        let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
+        ocx.register_obligations(obligations.iter().cloned());
+        let errors_and_ambiguities = ocx.select_all_or_error();
         // We only care about the obligations that are *definitely* true errors.
         // Ambiguities do not prove the disjointness of two impls.
-        let errors = fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(infcx);
+        let (errors, ambiguities): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) =
+            errors_and_ambiguities.into_iter().partition(|error| error.is_true_error());
+
         if errors.is_empty() {
-            let overflow_errors = fulfill_cx.collect_remaining_errors(infcx);
-            let overflowing_predicates = overflow_errors
-                .into_iter()
-                .filter(|e| match e.code {
-                    FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: Some(true) } => true,
-                    _ => false,
-                })
-                .map(|e| infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(e.obligation.predicate))
-                .collect();
-            IntersectionHasImpossibleObligations::No { overflowing_predicates }
+            IntersectionHasImpossibleObligations::No {
+                overflowing_predicates: ambiguities
+                    .into_iter()
+                    .filter(|error| {
+                        matches!(
+                            error.code,
+                            FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: Some(true) }
+                        )
+                    })
+                    .map(|e| infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(e.obligation.predicate))
+                    .collect(),
+            }
         } else {
             IntersectionHasImpossibleObligations::Yes
         }
@@ -589,22 +591,22 @@ fn try_prove_negated_where_clause<'tcx>(
     // Without this, we over-eagerly register coherence ambiguity candidates when
     // impl candidates do exist.
     let ref infcx = root_infcx.fork_with_intercrate(false);
-    let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentCtxt::new(infcx);
-
-    fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(
-        infcx,
-        Obligation::new(infcx.tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, negative_predicate),
-    );
-    if !fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx).is_empty() {
+    let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
+    ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(
+        infcx.tcx,
+        ObligationCause::dummy(),
+        param_env,
+        negative_predicate,
+    ));
+    if !ocx.select_all_or_error().is_empty() {
         return false;
     }
 
     // FIXME: We could use the assumed_wf_types from both impls, I think,
     // if that wasn't implemented just for LocalDefId, and we'd need to do
     // the normalization ourselves since this is totally fallible...
     let outlives_env = OutlivesEnvironment::new(param_env);
-
-    let errors = infcx.resolve_regions(&outlives_env);
+    let errors = ocx.resolve_regions(&outlives_env);
     if !errors.is_empty() {
         return false;
     }
@@ -1129,22 +1131,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
                 result: Ok(_),
             } = cand.kind()
             {
-                let lazily_normalize_ty = |ty: Ty<'tcx>| {
-                    let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(infcx);
+                let lazily_normalize_ty = |mut ty: Ty<'tcx>| {
                     if matches!(ty.kind(), ty::Alias(..)) {
-                        // FIXME(-Znext-solver=coherence): we currently don't
-                        // normalize opaque types here, resulting in diverging behavior
-                        // for TAITs.
-                        match infcx
-                            .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
-                            .structurally_normalize(ty, &mut *fulfill_cx)
-                        {
-                            Ok(ty) => Ok(ty),
-                            Err(_errs) => Err(()),
+                        let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
+                        ty = ocx
+                            .structurally_normalize(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, ty)
+                            .map_err(|_| ())?;
+                        if !ocx.select_where_possible().is_empty() {
+                            return Err(());
                         }
-                    } else {
-                        Ok(ty)
                     }
+                    Ok(ty)
                 };
 
                 infcx.probe(|_| {