Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

const_eval_select: add tracking issue #124626

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented May 2, 2024

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 2, 2024

r? @joboet

rustbot has assigned @joboet.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 2, 2024
@RalfJung RalfJung force-pushed the const_eval_select branch from 3d727d2 to dbe2f51 Compare May 2, 2024 16:39
@@ -2578,8 +2578,7 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" {
///
/// Currently such an assertion would always succeed; until Rust decides
/// otherwise, that principle should not be violated.
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_eval_select", issue = "none")]
#[unstable(feature = "core_intrinsics", issue = "none")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't we need the non-const stability too?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything in this module is implicitly unstable under core_intrinsics, I think. Most of the other intrinsics here do not have that attribute either, no idea what it is present for some of them.

@joboet
Copy link
Member

joboet commented May 2, 2024

LGTM, r=me once CI is green

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r=joboet

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2024

📌 Commit dbe2f51 has been approved by joboet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 3, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123480 (deref patterns: impl `DerefPure` for more std types)
 - rust-lang#124412 (io safety: update Unix explanation to use `Arc`)
 - rust-lang#124441 (String.truncate comment microfix (greater or equal))
 - rust-lang#124594 (run-make-support: preserve tooks.mk behavior for EXTRACXXFLAGS)
 - rust-lang#124604 (library/std: Remove unused `gimli-symbolize` feature)
 - rust-lang#124607 (`rustc_expand` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#124609 (variable-precision float operations can differ depending on optimization levels)
 - rust-lang#124610 (Tweak `consts_may_unify`)
 - rust-lang#124626 (const_eval_select: add tracking issue)
 - rust-lang#124637 (AST pretty: Use `builtin_syntax` for type ascription)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#124638 (Move some tests from `rustc_expand` to `rustc_parse`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e2a5344 into rust-lang:master May 3, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 3, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124626 - RalfJung:const_eval_select, r=joboet

const_eval_select: add tracking issue
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the const_eval_select branch May 3, 2024 13:29
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

RalfJung commented May 3, 2024

@bors rollup

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

RalfJung commented May 3, 2024

Uh, somehow this is still in the bors queue...
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants