-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #125567
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #125567
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… r=Mark-Simulacrum tidy: stop special-casing tests/ui entry limit It is genuinely more annoying to have this error, now that this value is below the general `ENTRY_LIMIT` cap, when one is trying to clean out tests from tests/ui! This code has served its purpose well, let it rest now rather than force it to continue haunting us.
…=Mark-Simulacrum Create a triagebot ping group for Rust for Linux Corresponding rustc-dev-guide PR [here](rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1984). Discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Testing.20Rust.20for.20Linux.20in.20our.20CI).
…, r=compiler-errors drop region constraints for ambiguous goals See the comment in `compute_external_query_constraints`. While the underlying issue is preexisting, this fixes a bug introduced by rust-lang#125343. It slightly weakens the leak chec, even if we didn't have any test which was affected. I want to write such a test before merging this PR. r? `@compiler-errors`
A small diagnostic improvement for dropping_copy_types For a value `m` which implements `Copy` trait, `drop(m);` does nothing. We now suggest user to ignore it by a abstract and general note: `let _ = ...`. I think we can give a clearer note here: `let _ = m;` fixes rust-lang#125189 <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> -->
Stop SRoA'ing `DynMetadata` in MIR Fixes rust-lang#125506
cleanup dependence of `ExtCtxt` in transcribe when macro expansion part of rust-lang#125356 We can remove `transcribe`’s dependence on `ExtCtxt` to facilitate subsequent work (such as moving macro expansion into the incremental compilation system) r? ``@petrochenkov`` Thanks for the reviewing!
…ific, r=Mark-Simulacrum Also mention my-self for other check-cfg docs changes This PR adds a mention for my-self for the recently added `src/doc/rustc/src/check-cfg` directory. *I had to add a second mention just for the directory since [`Path::starts_with`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/path/struct.Path.html#method.starts_with) as used by [triagebot](https://github.com/rust-lang/triagebot/blob/48f29f351cae774caa90f555fbbc6d0df7dce80e/src/handlers/mentions.rs#L69), matches on path components and so can never return true for a file and directory at the same time.*
…=workingjubilee Simplify the `unchecked_sh[lr]` ub-checks a bit It can use the constant in the check, rather than passing it as a parameter.
rustbot
added
A-meta
Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
May 26, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=8 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 26, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#125307 (tidy: stop special-casing tests/ui entry limit) - rust-lang#125375 (Create a triagebot ping group for Rust for Linux) - rust-lang#125413 (drop region constraints for ambiguous goals) - rust-lang#125433 (A small diagnostic improvement for dropping_copy_types) - rust-lang#125508 (Stop SRoA'ing `DynMetadata` in MIR) - rust-lang#125530 (cleanup dependence of `ExtCtxt` in transcribe when macro expansion) - rust-lang#125544 (Also mention my-self for other check-cfg docs changes) - rust-lang#125559 (Simplify the `unchecked_sh[lr]` ub-checks a bit) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
May 26, 2024
A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain) Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta
Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
DynMetadata
in MIR #125508 (Stop SRoA'ingDynMetadata
in MIR)ExtCtxt
in transcribe when macro expansion #125530 (cleanup dependence ofExtCtxt
in transcribe when macro expansion)unchecked_sh[lr]
ub-checks a bit #125559 (Simplify theunchecked_sh[lr]
ub-checks a bit)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup