-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 7 pull requests #128148
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #128148
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
``` error: bare CR not allowed in doc-comment --> $DIR/lex-bare-cr-string-literal-doc-comment.rs:3:32 | LL | /// doc comment with bare CR: '␍' | ^ ```
No longer track "zero-width" chars in `SourceMap`, read directly from the line when calculating the `display_col` of a `BytePos`. Move `char_width` to `rustc_span` and use it from the emitter. This change allows the following to properly align in terminals (depending on the font, the replaced control codepoints are rendered as 1 or 2 width, on my terminal they are rendered as 1, on VSCode text they are rendered as 2): ``` error: this file contains an unclosed delimiter --> $DIR/issue-68629.rs:5:17 | LL | ␜␟ts␀![{i | -- unclosed delimiter | | | unclosed delimiter LL | ␀␀ fn rݻoa>rݻm | ^ ```
We already point these out quite aggressively, telling people not to use them, but would normally be rendered as nothing. Having them visible will make it easier for people to actually deal with them. ``` error: unicode codepoint changing visible direction of text present in literal --> $DIR/unicode-control-codepoints.rs:26:22 | LL | println!("{:?}", '�'); | ^-^ | || | |'\u{202e}' | this literal contains an invisible unicode text flow control codepoint | = note: these kind of unicode codepoints change the way text flows on applications that support them, but can cause confusion because they change the order of characters on the screen = help: if their presence wasn't intentional, you can remove them help: if you want to keep them but make them visible in your source code, you can escape them | LL | println!("{:?}", '\u{202e}'); | ~~~~~~~~ ``` vs the previous ``` error: unicode codepoint changing visible direction of text present in literal --> $DIR/unicode-control-codepoints.rs:26:22 | LL | println!("{:?}", ''); | ^- | || | |'\u{202e}' | this literal contains an invisible unicode text flow control codepoint | = note: these kind of unicode codepoints change the way text flows on applications that support them, but can cause confusion because they change the order of characters on the screen = help: if their presence wasn't intentional, you can remove them help: if you want to keep them but make them visible in your source code, you can escape them | LL | println!("{:?}", '\u{202e}'); | ~~~~~~~~ ```
Now that rust-lang#90435 seems to have been resolved.
With rust-lang/miri#3739 merged, the deduplication hack is no longer necessary.
We are moving toward forbidding `missing_fragment_specifier` either in edition 2024 or unconditionally. Make a first step toward this by ensuring crates that rely on the old behavior are reported when used as dependencies. Tracking issue: <rust-lang#128143>
Improved clarity of documentation for std::fs::create_dir_all Closes rust-lang#88264
…i-obk Replace ASCII control chars with Unicode Control Pictures Replace ASCII control chars like `CR` with Unicode Control Pictures like `␍`: ``` error: bare CR not allowed in doc-comment --> $DIR/lex-bare-cr-string-literal-doc-comment.rs:3:32 | LL | /// doc comment with bare CR: '␍' | ^ ``` Centralize the checking of unicode char width for the purposes of CLI display in one place. Account for the new replacements. Remove unneeded tracking of "zero-width" unicode chars, as we calculate these in the `SourceMap` as needed now.
…mpiler-errors Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds Fixes rust-lang#127441 Now when we encounter something like `foo(a : impl ?Sized + ?Sized)`, instead of suggesting removal of both bounds and leaving `foo(a: impl )` behind, we suggest changing the first bound to `Sized` and removing the second bound, resulting in `foo(a: impl Sized)`. Although the issue was reported for impl trait types, it also occurred with regular param bounds. So if we encounter `foo<T: ?Sized + ?Sized>(a: T)` we now detect that all the bounds are `?Sized` and therefore emit the suggestion to remove the entire predicate `: ?Sized + ?Sized` resulting in `foo<T>(a: T)`. Lastly, if we encounter a situation where some of the bounds are something other than `?Sized`, then we emit separate removal suggestions for each `?Sized` bound. E.g. if we see `foo(a: impl ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized)` or `foo<T: ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized>(a: T)` we emit suggestions such that the user will be left with `foo(a : impl Bar)` or `foo<T: Bar>(a: T)` respectively.
Fix some `#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(..))]` Now that rust-lang#90435 seems to have been resolved.
…r-unconditional, r=petrochenkov Mark `missing_fragment_specifier` as `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps` We are moving toward forbidding `missing_fragment_specifier` either in edition 2024 or unconditionally. Make a first step toward this by ensuring crates that rely on the old behavior are reported when used as dependencies. Tracking issue: <rust-lang#128143>
std: use duplicate thread local state in tests With rust-lang/miri#3739 merged, the deduplication hack is no longer necessary.
…r-conversions, r=compiler-errors Remove Unnecessary `.as_str()` Conversions Because comparing interned values is much more efficient than converting a `rustc_span::symbol::Ident` to `&str` and then doing the comparison. docs: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nightly-rustc/rustc_span/symbol/struct.Ident.html#method.as_str
rustbot
added
A-query-system
Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html)
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jul 24, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jul 24, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126548 (Improved clarity of documentation for std::fs::create_dir_all) - rust-lang#127528 (Replace ASCII control chars with Unicode Control Pictures) - rust-lang#127717 (Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds) - rust-lang#128046 (Fix some `#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(..))]`) - rust-lang#128122 (Mark `missing_fragment_specifier` as `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps`) - rust-lang#128135 (std: use duplicate thread local state in tests) - rust-lang#128140 (Remove Unnecessary `.as_str()` Conversions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jul 24, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-query-system
Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html)
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(..))]
#128046 (Fix some#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(..))]
)missing_fragment_specifier
asFutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps
#128122 (Markmissing_fragment_specifier
asFutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps
).as_str()
Conversions #128140 (Remove Unnecessary.as_str()
Conversions)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup