-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Report the note
when specified in diagnostic::on_unimplemented
#130123
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Nadrieril (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | |||
pub trait ProviderLt {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test doesn't really exercise anything. Could you please delete it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ping :)
struct B; | ||
|
||
fn main() { | ||
B.request(); //~ ERROR 15:7: 15:14: my message [E0599] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
B.request(); //~ ERROR 15:7: 15:14: my message [E0599] | |
B.request(); | |
//~^ ERROR my message | |
//~| LABEL my label | |
//~| NOTE my note |
7ffb12d
to
5168584
Compare
@@ -1363,6 +1363,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { | |||
"the following trait bounds were not satisfied:\n{bound_list}" | |||
)); | |||
} | |||
for note in notes { | |||
debug!("FCB {}", note); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FCB? can you remove?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I beg your pardon, I had forgotten :'D
fn main() { | ||
B.request(); | ||
} | ||
//~^^ my message [E0599] | ||
//~| my label | ||
//~| my note |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fn main() { | |
B.request(); | |
} | |
//~^^ my message [E0599] | |
//~| my label | |
//~| my note | |
fn main() { | |
B.request(); | |
//~^ my message | |
//~| my label | |
//~| my note | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you. This is my first contribution, from the next I will learn best practices.
b8ce945
to
252f8ec
Compare
@compiler-errors Thank you for your review. It should be okay now, let me know |
You still didn't delete the test file I asked to be deleted |
Signed-off-by: FedericoBruzzone <federico.bruzzone.i@gmail.com>
252f8ec
to
4cecf42
Compare
I had deleted an incorrect file |
@bors r+ rollup |
…r-errors Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` Before this PR the `note` field was completely ignored for some reason, now it is shown (I think) correctly during the hir typechecking phase. 1. Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` 2. Added a test for unimplemented trait diagnostic 3. Added a test for custom unimplemented trait diagnostic Close rust-lang#130084 P.S. This is my first PR to rustc.
…kingjubilee Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#129260 (Don't suggest adding return type for closures with default return type) - rust-lang#129520 (Suggest the correct pattern syntax on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant) - rust-lang#129696 (update stdarch) - rust-lang#129759 (Stabilize `const_refs_to_static`) - rust-lang#129835 (enable const-float-classify test, and test_next_up/down on 32bit x86) - rust-lang#129866 (Clarify documentation labelling and definitions for std::collections) - rust-lang#130052 (Don't leave debug locations for constants sitting on the builder indefinitely) - rust-lang#130077 (Fix linking error when compiling for 32-bit watchOS) - rust-lang#130123 (Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`) - rust-lang#130156 (Add test for S_OBJNAME & update test for LF_BUILDINFO cl and cmd) - rust-lang#130206 (Map `WSAEDQUOT` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemQuotaExceeded`) - rust-lang#130207 (Map `ERROR_CANT_RESOLVE_FILENAME` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemLoop`) - rust-lang#130219 (Fix false positive with `missing_docs` and `#[test]`) - rust-lang#130221 (Make SearchPath::new public) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#129260 (Don't suggest adding return type for closures with default return type) - rust-lang#129520 (Suggest the correct pattern syntax on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant) - rust-lang#129866 (Clarify documentation labelling and definitions for std::collections) - rust-lang#130123 (Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`) - rust-lang#130161 (refactor merge base logic and fix `x fmt`) - rust-lang#130206 (Map `WSAEDQUOT` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemQuotaExceeded`) - rust-lang#130207 (Map `ERROR_CANT_RESOLVE_FILENAME` to `ErrorKind::FilesystemLoop`) - rust-lang#130219 (Fix false positive with `missing_docs` and `#[test]`) - rust-lang#130221 (Make SearchPath::new public) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130123 - FedericoBruzzone:master, r=compiler-errors Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` Before this PR the `note` field was completely ignored for some reason, now it is shown (I think) correctly during the hir typechecking phase. 1. Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` 2. Added a test for unimplemented trait diagnostic 3. Added a test for custom unimplemented trait diagnostic Close rust-lang#130084 P.S. This is my first PR to rustc.
Before this PR the
note
field was completely ignored for some reason, now it is shown (I think) correctly during the hir typechecking phase.note
when specified indiagnostic::on_unimplemented
Close #130084
P.S. This is my first PR to rustc.