Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove Waker::waker from 1.82 relnotes #131796

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Remove Waker::waker from 1.82 relnotes #131796

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Oct 16, 2024

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 16, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 16, 2024
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 16, 2024

📌 Commit e0e2c45 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 16, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 16, 2024

⌛ Testing commit e0e2c45 with merge 180e9c5...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#131796 - cuviper:no-waker-waker, r=Mark-Simul…
180e9c5 
…acrum

Remove `Waker::waker` from 1.82 relnotes

This was noticed in <rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org#1415 (review)>.
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-ext failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 17, 2024
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Oct 17, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 17, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2024

⌛ Testing commit e0e2c45 with merge dd51276...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing dd51276 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 17, 2024
@bors bors merged commit dd51276 into rust-lang:master Oct 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Oct 17, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (dd51276): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -5.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -5.4% [-5.5%, -5.3%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 781.752s -> 781.077s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 333.73 MiB -> 333.74 MiB (0.00%)

@cuviper cuviper deleted the no-waker-waker branch November 8, 2024 17:36
@arielb1 arielb1 mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.84.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@cuviper @rustbot @Mark-Simulacrum @bors @rust-log-analyzer @rust-timer