Liberate aarch64-gnu-debug from the shackles of --test-args=clang

[jieyouxu]

Changes

• Drop --test-args=clang from aarch64-gnu-debug so run-make tests that are //@ needs-force-clang-based-tests no longer only run if their test name contains clang (which is a very cool footgun).
• Reorganize run-make-suport library slightly to accommodate a raw gcc invocation.
• Fix tests/run-make/mte-ffi/rmake.rs to use gcc instead of a c compiler.

try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug

[jieyouxu]

tests/run-make/mte-ffi
output status: `signal: 11 (SIGSEGV) (core dumped)`
prctl() failed: Invalid argument

Huh.

[jieyouxu]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit ce79835 with merge 5726f86...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[jieyouxu]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit a6dac70 with merge a905c9c...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a905c9c (a905c9cfe76e0551956549194fb35bcd8d587645)

[jieyouxu]

Uh actually maybe r? @Kobzol (mostly trivial run-make test stuff + adjusting a CI job's flag tbh)

[Kobzol]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit a6dac70 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit a6dac70 with merge 5ec7d6e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kobzol
Pushing 5ec7d6e to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (5ec7d6e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.8%	[-0.8%, -0.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -1.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[2.5%, 2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.2%	[-3.3%, -3.2%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 788.509s -> 789.328s (0.10%)
Artifact size: 335.54 MiB -> 335.47 MiB (-0.02%)