Feature gate yield expressions not in 2024 #132668
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @davidtwco rustbot has assigned @davidtwco. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
davidtwco
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2024
ehuss
force-pushed
the
yield-gate-2024
branch
from
d55f925 to
e04acff
Compare
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#132651 (Remove attributes from generics in built-in derive macros) - rust-lang#132668 (Feature gate yield expressions not in 2024) - rust-lang#132771 (test(configure): cover `parse_args` in `src/bootstrap/configure.py`) - rust-lang#132895 (Generalize `NonNull::from_raw_parts` per ACP362) - rust-lang#132914 (Update grammar in std::cell docs.) - rust-lang#132927 (Consolidate type system const evaluation under `traits::evaluate_const`) - rust-lang#132935 (Make sure to ignore elided lifetimes when pointing at args for fulfillment errors) - rust-lang#132941 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#132668 - ehuss:yield-gate-2024, r=davidtwco Feature gate yield expressions not in 2024 This changes it so that yield expressions are no longer allowed in the 2024 edition without a feature gate. We are currently only reserving the `gen` keyword in the 2024 edition, and not allowing anything else to be implicitly enabled by the edition. In practice this doesn't have a significant difference since yield expressions can't really be used outside of coroutines or gen blocks, which have their own feature gates. However, it does affect what is accepted pre-expansion, and I would feel more comfortable not allowing yield expressions. I believe the stabilization process for gen blocks or coroutines will not need to check the edition here, so this shouldn't ever be needed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This changes it so that yield expressions are no longer allowed in the 2024 edition without a feature gate. We are currently only reserving the
genkeyword in the 2024 edition, and not allowing anything else to be implicitly enabled by the edition.In practice this doesn't have a significant difference since yield expressions can't really be used outside of coroutines or gen blocks, which have their own feature gates. However, it does affect what is accepted pre-expansion, and I would feel more comfortable not allowing yield expressions.
I believe the stabilization process for gen blocks or coroutines will not need to check the edition here, so this shouldn't ever be needed.