-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests: Test pac-ret flag merging on clang with LTO #133045
Merged
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
mrkajetanp:pauth-test-clang-lto-flag-merge
Nov 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: is there any background / links for this? I'm fine with the change, but it's even better if there's any kind of context to read.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For sure, this is the context:
llvm/llvm-project@1782810
TLDR: there was a bug in LLVM where during the LTO step instructions like "pacibsp" would get replaced with "paciasp" due to LLVM module flag merging behaviour. As currently written the assembly output should have no PAuth on library functions,
paciasp
at the start of main andpacibsp
at the start offoo
.It is worrying that the test is failing, I'll try to reproduce it locally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the context. And I agree, the test failing is... suspicious lol. Can you please include your reply as a test comment to help a
$FUTURE_READER
not have to find this PR to understand the context?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also it might help if you do something like
let clang_version = clang().arg("-v").run();
and then print that to double-check what clang version CI has.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay this is very funny
The test fails because the compiler optimises away the entire call to
foo
and its pac instructions along with it. I'll fix it..There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right... That can explain it lol.
black_box
to the rescue.