-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
clarify requirements of byte_{offset,add,sub}
for zero-sized referents
#133576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
+34
−22
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ | |
//! The precise rules for validity are not determined yet. The guarantees that are | ||
//! provided at this point are very minimal: | ||
//! | ||
//! * For operations of [size zero][zst], *every* pointer is valid, including the [null] pointer. | ||
//! * For operations of size zero, *every* pointer is valid, including the [null] pointer. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This leaves a dangling |
||
//! The following points are only concerned with non-zero-sized accesses. | ||
//! * A [null] pointer is *never* valid. | ||
//! * For a pointer to be valid, it is necessary, but not always sufficient, that the pointer be | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The docs for pointer::offset don't even have any guidance about zero-sized references? In fact, neither operation involves any reference at all! Only raw pointers are involved.
I don't understand which problem you see with the current docs, and I think the new sentence is quite confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So to be clear, please undo all these changes to the bytewise offset methods in your PR, and only keep the change in
library/core/src/ptr/mod.rs
.