-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
js-doc-test has been renamed to rustdoc-js #135595
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
js-doc-test has been renamed to rustdoc-js #135595
Conversation
Oh yeah I missed that, thanks |
@bors r- |
(Is there a reason this is draft?) |
reason for draft is lack of an automated test, and i can't test manually right now due to the build system falling apart at the seams again. if you wouldn't mind doing a quick local clone of this PR and making sure it works as intended (just build a otherwise i've gotta sort out this whole mess. |
ok, did something serious regress? i just deleted
which suggests rustdoc is not even getting run. |
if i run the test with looks like build artifacts are not being isolated enough or something?? |
anyways, i did get a stage0 rustdoc test to run successfully, so.. manual testing complete? |
@rustbot review |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
@bors r- |
Actually, I did some investigation locally. I'm not convinced the current formulation of rustdoc-js was implemented with |
./x test tests/rustdoc-js --stage 0 doesn't even build rustdoc, this can't be right. |
I'm going to close in favor of #135605, that we keep requiring |
the perils of working on two PRs in parallel.
r? @jieyouxu